The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What promotes success in L2 suprasegmental learning in foreign language classroom settings? The roles of perceptual, cognitive, and experiential individual differences in the acquisition of English word stress
Abstract
This study investigates how individual differences in perceptual-cognitive aptitude and L2 learning experience shape the acquisition of English word stress in foreign language (FL) classroom settings, addressing gaps in prior research that has primarily focused on L2 segmental learning. A total of 119 Japanese English-as-a-foreign-language students completed a word stress identification task alongside measures of auditory processing, working memory, and L2 learning experience. Their performance was assessed in terms of both accuracy and processing fluency (reaction time and response stability). Results showed that learners with more precise auditory processing, higher working memory capacity, and more frequent L2 use outside the classroom demonstrated greater accuracy in perceiving English word stress. In contrast, classroom-based experience and the length or onset of FL learning had limited impact. Processing fluency was only weakly related to these factors, showing substantial individual variability. The findings suggest that in input-limited FL contexts, successful L2 suprasegmental learning depends heavily on perceptual-cognitive aptitude and opportunities for L2 use beyond the classroom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Spanish speaking learners' ability to perceive and produce NA may be partly explained by individual differences research (Bakkouche & Saito, 2026;Hosaka & Saito, 2026;Kidd et al., 2018;Li et al., 2022).”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Hosaka & Saito, 2026
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“One reason this issue remains unresolved is the comparatively limited attention given to suprasegmentals, even though suprasegmental features are central to how meaning is organised and interpreted in spoken language, contributing to intelligibility, discourse coherence, prominence marking, and pragmatic interpretation (Fadilla et al., 2023;Gordon & Darcy, 2018, 2022;Hosaka & Saito, 2026;Ladegaard”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Hosaka & Saito, 2026
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“an interpretation which corroborates recent work indicating that L2 speech learning is shaped not only by crosslinguistic influence but also by perceptual, cognitive, auditory-processing, and experiential differences among learners (Bakkouche & Saito, 2026;Hosaka & Saito, 2026).”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Hosaka & Saito, 2026
In the citing paper
“These demands may be closer to auditorytemporal processing and prosodic attentional control than to the abilities measured by the MLAT subtests used here, as Hosaka and Saito (2026) have suggested.”
From On English Language Learners’ Prosody: The Possible Impact of L2 Aptitude, Musical Ability, and Proficiency on Nuclear Accent Placement in Spanish L1 Contexts (2026) · cites this paper as Hosaka & Saito, 2026
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saito, K., & Hanzawa, K. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816679030 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 109
- 10.1016/j.system.2009.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1367006912466314 · DOI
- 10.1186/1744-9081-7-44 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108886901.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/xlm0001246 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1366728904001592 · DOI
- Baker-Smemoe, 2012, Relationship between reported out-of-class English use and gains in English, Applied Language Learning, 22, 21
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x · DOI · Paper page
- Flege, 2009, Input matters in SLA, 175
- 10.1111/lang.12242 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.02.004 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x · DOI
- Freed, 1990, Linguistics, language teaching and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice and research, 459
- 10.1017/S0272263120000649 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0267190524000047 · DOI
- Dekeyser, 2012, Automatization, Skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition, The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 40, 63
- 10.1017/S0142716415000259 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1366728922000700 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203851357 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0142716408080089 · DOI
- 10.1177/0267658320978493 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12414 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263117000249 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104481 · DOI
- 10.1017/S027226312300044X · DOI
- Schmidt, 2001, Motivation and second language acquisition, 313
- 10.1017/S0272263120000467 · DOI
- Jiang, 2011, Conducting reaction time research in second language studies
- 10.4324/9781003022497-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S1366728912000703 · DOI
- 10.21832/ISAACS6848 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105236 · DOI
- Wang, Q. (2008). Perception of English stress by Mandarin Chinese learners of English: An acoustic study (Doctoral dissertation).
- 10.1017/S0142716414000137 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.001 · DOI
- 10.1002/tesq.34 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/amm056 · DOI
- 10.1177/00238309020450030101 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.4926561 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263117000432 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/amu072 · DOI
- Darcy, 2014, Attention control and inhibition influence phonological development in a second language, Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 115
- 10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor · DOI
- 10.2307/3588487 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.428217 · DOI
- 10.1075/z.208 · DOI
- 10.1075/jslp.21042.gor · DOI
- 10.1017/S027226311500042X · DOI
- DeKeyser, 2003, The handbook of second language acquisition, 313
- 10.1017/S0142716400010572 · DOI
- 10.1111/nyas.12627 · DOI
- 10.2307/3588378 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12447 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716420000491 · DOI
- Tsujimura, 1996, Annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society, 22, 406
- 10.1017/S0272263198002034 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716409990014 · DOI
- 10.1006/jpho.2002.0174 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263199001035 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315676968-2 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315122021-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Miyake, 1998, Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention, 339
- 10.1017/S026144482510102X · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263119000603 · DOI
- 10.1075/jslp.17038.tho · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.1912375 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108886901 · DOI
- 10.1159/000261655 · DOI
- 10.1163/9789004653412 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716407070312 · DOI
- Saito, 2024, Auditory processing as perceptual, cognitive, and motoric abilities underlying successful second language acquisition: Interaction model, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50, 119
- 10.1007/978-3-319-30373-4_3 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263101004041 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716400010845 · DOI
- 10.1177/1362168816643111 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.36366/frontiers.v15i1.223 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263112000150 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12161 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780429449642-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12000 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.1908095 · DOI
- Kormos, 2015, The Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics)
- 10.4324/9781003414643 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263106060013 · DOI
- 10.1177/002383095800100207 · DOI
- Lee, 2021, Non-native English listeners adaptation to native English speakers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1, 1
- 10.1017/S1366728925100850 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12561 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716420000193 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263104262027 · DOI
- 10.1111/lang.12322 · DOI
- 10.1075/jslp.21035.dar · DOI
- 10.1515/iral.2011.016 · DOI
- Konishi, T. , & Kondo, M. (2015). Developmental change in English stress manifestation by Japanese Speakers. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Science, Glasgow, UK, Paper No.10291, 10–14August, 2015.
- 10.1177/0267658307082981 · DOI
- Mora, 2017, Task-based pronunciation teaching and research: Key issues and future directions, System, 39, 381
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00434.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1204319109 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijal.12026 · DOI
- 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279 · DOI
- 10.1177/0963721411429458 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.21832/9781853598937 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/amu024 · DOI
- Wisniewska, 2020, Can captioned video benefit second language pronunciation?, System, 42, 599
- 10.1075/bpa.3.12dar · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barra–García, C. F., Véliz-Campos, M., Figueroa Candia, M. A., Pereira-Reyes, Y., & Kartsevski Dune, M. (2026) · Language Teaching Research Quarterly · doi:10.32038/ltrq.2026.55.04
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosaka, I., & Saito, K.
- Affiliations
- University College London Institute of Education
- Venue
- Applied Psycholinguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2026
- Volume
- 47
- ISSN
- 0142-7164
- 1469-1817
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What promotes success in L2 suprasegmental learning in foreign language classroom settings? The roles of perceptual, cognitive, and experiential individual differences in the acquisition of English word stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0142716426100460
- The paper
- Hosaka, I., & Saito, K. (2026). What promotes success in L2 suprasegmental learning in foreign language classroom settings? The roles of perceptual, cognitive, and experiential individual differences in the acquisition of English word stress. Applied Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716426100460