The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation
Abstract
This paper challenges the widespread view that writing is somehow peripheral to the more serious aspects of university life – doing research and teaching students. It argues that universities are about writing and that specialist forms of academic literacy are at the heart of everything we do: central to constructing knowledge, educating students and negotiating a professional academic career. Seeing literacy as embedded in the beliefs and practices of individual disciplines, instead of a generic skill that students have failed to develop at school, helps explain the difficulties both students and academics have in controlling the conventions of disciplinary discourses. Ultimately, and in an important sense, we are what we write, and we need to understand the distinctive ways our disciplines have of addressing colleagues and presenting arguments, as it is through language that academics and students conceptualise their subjects and argue their claims persuasively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fee, D., & Fairclough, N. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074659 · Cited by 11,611
Corsaro, W. A., & Bourdieu, P. (1992) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579985 · Cited by 9,964
Introduction to Functional Grammar
Matthiessen, C., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1989) · Language · doi:10.2307/414947 · Cited by 9,880
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Castro, C. D., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/415759 · Cited by 5,989
Kress, G. (2003) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203164754 · Cited by 3,567
Foucault, M. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9780203996645 · Cited by 3,281
Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 2,980
Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts
Austin, J. (1982) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(82)90228-3 · Cited by 2,883
Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse
Hyland, K. (2005) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445605050365 · Cited by 1,998
Self-citationDisciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing
Sun, J., & Hyland, K. (2001) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587657 · Cited by 1,970
Self-citation
Cited by
An Investigation of the Iranian EFL Learners’ Perceptions Towards the Most Common Writing Problems
Derakhshan, A., & Karimian Shirejini, R. (2020) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020919523 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyland, K.
- Venue
- Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-70
- ISSN
- 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3049
- OpenAlex
- W2170020655
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 101.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0261444811000036
- The paper
- Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444811000036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.