Cited by 3,281Foucault, Power, and EthicsPhilosophy and Social TheoryLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics

The Order of Things

Foucault, Michel·2005·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

When one defines "order" as a sorting of priorities, it becomes beautifully clear as to what Foucault is doing here. With virtuoso showmanship, he weaves an intensely complex history of thought. He dips into literature, art, economics and even biology in The Order of Things, possibly one of the most significant, yet most overlooked, works of the twentieth century. Eclipsed by his later work on power and discourse, nonetheless it was The Order of Things that established Foucault's reputation as an intellectual giant. Pirouetting around the outer edge of language, Foucault unsettles the surface of literary writing. In describing the limitations of our usual taxonomies, he opens the door onto a whole new system of thought, one ripe with what he calls "exotic charm". Intellectual pyrotechnics from the master of critical thinking, this book is crucial reading for those who wish to gain insight into that odd beast called Postmodernism, and a must for any fan of Foucault.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203996645

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Practitioners constructed themselves an affective heterotopia-a space carved out by affect that is entwined with all other sites and sets of relations in society, only to suspend and invert them-in (and around) the hashtag #girls help girls#.

    “Combining Massumi's (2002) affect theory with Foucault's (1986Foucault's ( , 2005) heterotopia, we argue that practitioners constructed themselves an affective heterotopia-a space carved out by affect that is entwined with all other sites and sets of relations in the society, only to suspend and invert them-in (and around) the hashtag #girls help girls#.”
  • Classification is a process imbued with social, economic, and organizational imperatives.

    “Classification is a process imbued with social, economic, and organizational imperatives [17, 38].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foucault, M.
Corresponding author
Foucault, Michel
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2005-08-18
OpenAlex
W286844892
Cited by
3,281
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 154 · 2015: 144 · 2014: 155 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 128
FWCI
177.18
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Philosophy and Social Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Keywords
Michel Foucault, The Order of Things, history of knowledge, taxonomy (general classification scheme), classification, literary composition, exoticism, postmodernism, intellectual history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review