The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and spatial organization of an Amazonian terra firme forest primate community
Abstract
A high-diversity primate community consisting of 13 species was examined at an entirely undisturbed and remote terra firme forest near the headwaters of the Urucu River, Amazonas, Brazil. Twelve of these species used a 900-ha study plot, located 4 km or more inland from the river, and comprised a total group density of 16 groups km−2, an overall density of 146 individuals km−2, a crude community biomass of 381 kg km−2, and a metabolic biomass of 278 kg 0.75 km−2. These species were occasionally found together within small (≥1 km 2) areas of forest, so long as they included the full complement of available forest types. More frequently, however, only half the species co-occurred in a single habitat type at any one time, reflecting a relatively consistent pattern of subcommunity spatial organization. Habitat generalist species making extensive, yearround use of the predominant habitat type (high forest), were common, whereas habitat specialists were uncommon to very rare, and confined to minor habitats. Those species coexisting throughout the year in high forest were found to segregate vertically from one another. These and other modal patterns of community structure were disrupted seasonally by long-distance, inland movements by two ‘igapó’ forest species living in large groups – squirrel monkeys and white-face capuchins – to high forest areas, which apparently resulted from a food bottleneck in their habitat. Another species found in large groups – woolly monkeys – also exercised seasonally vagrant movements within the high forest matrix, which coincided with periods of greatest scarcity of mature fleshy fruits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Primate ecology and social organization
Clutton‐Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H. (1977) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1977.tb04171.x · Cited by 978
Cited by
The Phenology of Tropical Forests: Adaptive Significance and Consequences for Primary Consumers
van Schaik, C. P., Terborgh, J. W., & Wright, S. J. (1993) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002033 · Cited by 1,292
Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park
Bass, M. S., Finer, M., Jenkins, C. N., Kreft, H., Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., McCracken, S. F., Pitman, N. C. A., English, P. H., Swing, K., Villa, G., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008767 · Cited by 346
General guidelines for standardizing line-transect surveys of tropical forest primates
Peres, C. A. (1999) · Neotropical Primates · doi:10.62015/np.1999.v7.414 · Cited by 299
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peres, C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Tropical Ecology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-276
- ISSN
- 0266-4674 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7831
- OpenAlex
- W2083326017
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and spatial organization of an Amazonian terra firme forest primate community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s026646740000729x
- The paper
- Peres, C. A. (1993). Structure and spatial organization of an Amazonian terra firme forest primate community. Journal of Tropical Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646740000729x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.