The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
11. CROSSING FRONTIERS: NEW DIRECTIONS IN ONLINE PEDAGOGY AND RESEARCH
Abstract
Research on networked language learning is now entering its second decade. While earlier research tended to focus on the linguistic and affective characteristics of computer-assisted discussion in single classrooms, more recent research has increasingly focused on long-distance collaboration. This type of learning environment is challenging to arrange, because it involves diverse learners who operate with different cultural backgrounds, communicative expectations, and rhetorical frameworks. These features, as well as the fact that the communication takes place both inside and outside of class and on students' own schedules, also pose special research challenges. This chapter summarizes what knowledge has been gained about learning and instruction in long-distance online exchanges, focusing on three key themes: (a) linguistic interaction and development, (b) intercultural awareness and learning, and (c) development of new multiliteracies and their relations to identity. In each area, research has indicated that there is no single effect of using online communication, but rather that processes and results vary widely depending on a range of logistical, pedagogical, and social factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamlet on the holodeck: the future of narrative in cyberspace
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1342 · Cited by 2,780
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Thorne, S. L. (2003) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25200 · Cited by 573 · cited 3×
“discussion, and synchronous chat for communication and collaboration with a partner class abroad, while the second class serves as a control group, using the same electronic media for intraclass communication only (Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Understanding and Working with ‘Failed Communication’ in Telecollaborative Exchanges
O'Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v23i3.623-642 · Cited by 359
Future Foreign Language Teachers' Social and Cognitive Collaboration in an Online Environment
Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44046 · Cited by 257
Technology and Task-Based Language Teaching
Lai, C., & Li, G. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.2.498-521 · Cited by 255
Bridging the language and cultural gaps: the use of blogs
García-Sánchez, S., & Rojas-Lizana, S. (2012) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2012.719396 · Cited by 28
Moloney, R. (2013) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708477.2013.776068 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 243-260
- ISSN
- 0267-1905 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6356
- OpenAlex
- W2116053486
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 82.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 11. CROSSING FRONTIERS: NEW DIRECTIONS IN ONLINE PEDAGOGY AND RESEARCH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0267190504000091
- The paper
- Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). 11. CROSSING FRONTIERS: NEW DIRECTIONS IN ONLINE PEDAGOGY AND RESEARCH. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190504000091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.