Are Classroom and Naturalistic Acquisition the Same?: A Study of the Classroom Acquisition of German Word Order Rules
Abstract
This article reports a study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules by adult, successful language learners. Data elicited by an information-gap task performed by 39 learners of L2 Germanat two points in time are used to describe the sequence of acquisition of three obligatory word order rules. A comparison of this sequencewith that reported for naturalistic learners of German revealed no difference, despite the fact that the order in which the rules were introduced and the degree of emphasis given to the rules in the instruction differed from the naturalistic order. The classroom learners, however, did appear to be more successful than the naturalistic learnersin that they reached higher levels of acquisition in a shorter period of time. The results of this study support the claim that the classroom and naturalistic L2 acquisition of complex grammatical features such as word order follow similar routes. They also suggest that classroom learners may learn more rapidly. These findings are discussed with reference to both theories of L2 acquisition and language pedagogy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acquisition sequences do not reflect instructional sequences.
“Research by R. Ellis (1989) and Lightbown (1983), for example, shows that acquisition sequences do not reflect instructional sequences”
From Focus on Form in Task-based Language Teaching (2000) · cites this paper as R. Ellis (1989)
Instruction has failed to alter developmental sequences.
“as has the failure of instruction to alter them (R. Ellis, 1989;Håkansson & Norrby, 2010;Mackey, 1999;Pienemann, 1984).”
From In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues (2016) · cites this paper as R. Ellis, 1989
Cites
Does Second Language Instruction Make a Difference? A Review of Research
Long, M. H. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586253 · Cited by 573 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Long's (1983a) review of the effects of formal instruction supports such a contention; classroom learners appear to learn more rapidly than naturalistic learners.”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Task‐based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings
Ellis, R. (2009) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x · Cited by 1,031 · see citing works
Self-citationFocus on Form in Task-based Language Teaching
Long, M. (2000) · Language Policy and Pedagogy · doi:10.1075/z.96.11lon · Cited by 440 · see citing works
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Consciousness in second language acquisition: A review of field studies and laboratory experiments
Ellis, N. C. (1995) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.1995.9959876 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Situating instructed language acquisition
VanPatten, B. (2017) · Instructed Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1558/isla.33315 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ellis, R.
- Corresponding author
- Ellis, Rod
- ORCID
- Ellis, Rod
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-328
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2152945286
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- German word order, second language acquisition, adult language learners, information-gap tasks, acquisition sequence, acquisition rate, language teaching, German as a second language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review