The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COMPETENCE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN NATIVE AND NEAR-NATIVE SPEAKERS: An Investigation of the Preterite-Imperfect Contrast in Spanish
Abstract
It has been suggested that tense and aspect distributions are very difficult to learn in a second language (L2), they are prone to fossilize universally, and their interpretive properties are subject to a critical period (Coppieters, 1987). This study focuses on the acquisition of the semantic implications of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish by English-speaking individuals of very advanced proficiency in Spanish who were not living in a Spanish-speaking country. By assuming that aspect is encoded in a functional category where the features [+/-perfective] are checked, depending on the language (Giorgi & Pianesi, 1997), this study asks whether ultimate attainment in the aspectual domain is possible and whether features of functional categories not selected in early childhood are subject to a critical period, as Hawkins and Chan's (1997) Failed Formal Features Hypothesis states. Experimental evidence from two tasks probing the interpretations of perfective and imperfective aspectual forms in Spanish suggests that many learners (almost 30%) in our total subject pool (including advanced to near-native speakers) and 70% of the near-native group performed like native speakers on all sentence types in all tasks. Although aspect is certainly a difficult area to master, particularly because the meanings of the imperfect are acquired quite late, L2 learners are clearly able to overcome the parametric options of their native language. At least for this domain, it is suggested that access to Universal Grammar does not necessarily decay with age in L2 acquisition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Biological Foundations of Language
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 · Cited by 6,605
L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/026765839601200103 · Cited by 1,743 · cited 1×
“…generative researchers have maintained that for conceptual and empirical reasons L1 and L2 acquisition appear to have a common epistemological basis (e.g., Schwartz & Sprouse, 1996, among others) and, at least to some extent, that the language faculty (i.e., UG) constrains L2 acquisition as well.”
BackgroundMaturational constraints on language learning
Newport, E. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2 · Cited by 1,738
Maturational constraints on language development.
Long, M. H. (1990) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100009165 · Cited by 1,090
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/026765897671476153 · Cited by 851 · cited 7×
“We also investigated the validity of a current theory of persistent fossilization in SLA based on generative linguistics—namely, Hawkins and Chan’s (1997) FFFH, which states that, after a critical period, formal features of functional categories that”
BackgroundInfluentialKohnert, K. J., Bates, E., & Hernandez, A. E. (1999) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4206.1400 · Cited by 219
The problem of age in second-language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task
Bialystok, E., & Miller, B. (1999) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728999000231 · Cited by 206
The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers
Kanno, K. (1997) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/026765897673070746 · Cited by 104 · cited 3×
“…L2 learners have also been shown to acquire very subtle properties of grammar that are not present in their L1, not obvious from the input, or not taught in language classrooms (Bruhn de Garavito, 1997; Dekydtspotter, Sprouse, & Anderson, 1997; Kanno, 1997; PérezLeroux & Glass, 1999; White, 2000).”
Background
Cited by
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
Self-citationAbrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x · Cited by 815
The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s027226310808073x · Cited by 446
What Makes Learning Second‐Language Grammar Difficult? A Review of Issues
DeKeyser, R. M. (2005) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x · Cited by 341
The role of language processing in language acquisition
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015) · Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/lab.5.4.01phi · Cited by 123
Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA)
Long, M. M. (2017) · Instructed Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1558/isla.33314 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 351-398
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2138905593
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 29.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.