The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE EFFECTS OF PLANNING ON FLUENCY, COMPLEXITY, AND ACCURACY IN SECOND LANGUAGE NARRATIVE WRITING
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In general, more advanced and diverse language allows to encode more complex ideas (Ellis & Yuan, 2004), which generates a higher cognitive load (Swabey et al., 2016).”
From The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Ellis & Yuan, 2004
In the citing paper
“improving media literacy to process more complex ideas will likely reduce the cognitive load associated with factual information (Ellis & Yuan, 2004;Swabey et al., 2016) and, therefore, the prevalence of misinformation.”
From The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions (2022) · cites this paper as Ellis & Yuan, 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
BIBER, D., GRAY, B., & POONPON, K. (2011) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.5054/tq.2011.244483 · Cited by 804
Lu, X. (2011) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.5054/tq.2011.240859 · Cited by 814
The potential role(s) of writing in second language development
Williams, J. (2012) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007 · Cited by 406
Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108643689 · Cited by 407
Self-citationLu, X., & Ai, H. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003 · Cited by 350
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-84
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W4252419718
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Keywords
- planning, fluency, complexity, accuracy, second language writing, narrative writing, writing process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
