Cited by 8EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

LEARNING CONDITION, LINGUISTIC COMPLEXITY, AND FIRST LANGUAGE TRANSFER IN SEMIARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE LEARNING

Gao, Jianwu, Ma, Shuang·2021·Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

This study explored the interaction between learning conditions, linguistic complexity, and first language (L1) syntactic transfer in semiartificial grammar learning by conceptually replicating and extending Tagarelli et al. (2016). We changed the L1 background, elicited production data during debriefing, and added a binary mixed-effects logistic regression analysis to compare variability at learner and item levels with group-level variation on exposure condition, linguistic complexity, and their interaction. Our results replicated those of the original study regarding the comparative efficacy of explicit instruction; however, we also found a condition × complexity interaction absent in the original study. Debriefing sentence-production data suggest that the changed L1-L2 typological distance may have leveled off the advantage of explicit instruction in the learning of the complex V2-VF structure. Finally, our mixed-effects modeling analysis revealed that variability at learner and item levels accounted for a larger proportion of the variance of the outcomes than all the predictors combined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263120000686

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. DeKeyser, 1998, Focus on form in classroom language acquisition, 42
  2. Maie, 2020, Eyeing acceptability judgment task: Automaticity moderates different L2 knowledge and processing
  3. Doughty, 1998, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 197

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, J., & Ma, S.
Affiliations
Capital Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ma, Shuang
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Published
2021-03-22
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
355-378
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
OpenAlex
W3136864449
Cited by
8
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in Second Language Acquisition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
first language transfer, syntactic transfer, linguistic complexity, learning conditions, explicit instruction, typological distance, sentence production, learner variability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review