The DOI matches its Crossref record.
INTONATION AS COHESION IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE: A Study of Chinese Speakers of English
Abstract
This paper reports the results of a study of the intonation of 18 Mandarin Chinese speakers lecturing in English. As a basis for the study, it is proposed that intonation be considered a grammar of cohesion in English discourse: Drawing from the intonational model of Pierrehumbert and Hirschberg (1990), it is argued that discrete morphemes of intonation correspond to the categories of cohesion in Halliday and Hasan's (1976) typology. The study investigated the hypothesis that the nonnative speakers who were able to use the intonation system of English most effectively would score higher on a global language test. Using a Computerized Speech Lab to measure pitch, four aspects of intonation were averaged for each speaker: (a) the pitch difference between newly introduced content words and function words, (b) the use of high pitch at phrase boundaries to link related constituents, (c) the use of pitch to distinguish contrasting items from given items, and (d) the paratone or increase in pitch range at rhetorical junctures to signal topic shift. These four measures were chosen for their contribution to the cohesion of the lectures. Multiple regression analysis indicates that the fourth intonation variable, the paratone, was a significant predictor of these subjects' English test scores. Examples are given of the other variables in context from both low- and high-scoring speakers. It is emphasized that intonation is not only a stylistic component of accent but also a meaning-bearing grammatical system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sueyoshi, A., & Hardison, D. M. (2005) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00320.x · Cited by 368
KANG, O., RUBIN, D., & PICKERING, L. (2010) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x · Cited by 347
Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness
Kang, O. (2010) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 · Cited by 327
Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-native Speech
Moyer, A. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794407 · Cited by 304
Beyond Segments: Towards a L2 Intonation Learning Theory
Mennen, I. (2015) · Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_9 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Wennerstrom, A.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2944619284
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INTONATION AS COHESION IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE: A Study of Chinese Speakers of English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0272263198001016
- The paper
- Wennerstrom, A. (1998). INTONATION AS COHESION IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE: A Study of Chinese Speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263198001016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.