The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Language differentiation in early bilingual development
Abstract
It has been claimed that children simultaneously acquiring two languages go through an initial stage when they are unable to differentiate between their two languages. Such claims have been based on the observation that at times virtually all bilingual children mix elements (e.g. lexical, morphological) from their two languages in the same utterance. That most, if not all, children acquiring two languages simultaneously mix linguistic elements in this way is widely documented. Although such code-mixing is not well understood or explained, there are a number of explanations unrelated to lack of language differentiation that may explain it. Moreover, while language differentiation is widely attested among bilingual children once functional categories emerge, usually during the third year, there is still some question as to how early in development differentiation is present. In this study, we examined language differentiation in five bilingual children prior to the emergence of functional categories (they ranged in age from 1;10 to 2;2 and in MLU from 1·23 to 2·08). They were observed with each parent separately and both together, on separate occasions. Our results indicate that while these children did code mix, they were clearly able to differentiate between their two languages. We also examine the possibility that the children's mixing is due to (a) their language dominance, and (b) their parents' rate of mixing. We could find no evidence that their mixing was due to parental input, but there was some evidence that language dominance played a role.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2018) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006916654355 · Cited by 309
Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese–English bilingual child
Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (2000) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s136672890000033x · Cited by 274
Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false‐belief reasoning
Kovács, Á. M. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00742.x · Cited by 247
Bilingual Grammar: Toward an Integrated Model
López, L. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108756181 · Cited by 147
Reasoning about other people's beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage.
Rubio-Fernández, P., & Glucksberg, S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0025162 · Cited by 122
Language Choices for Deaf Infants: Advice for Parents Regarding Sign Languages
Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. (2016) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/0009922815616891 · Cited by 76
Petitto, L. A. (. A., & Holowka, S. (2002) · Sign Language Studies · doi:10.1353/sls.2002.0025 · Cited by 56
Bilingual Language Dominance and Code-switching Patterns
Olson, D. J. (2024) · Heritage Language Journal · doi:10.1163/15507076-bja10027 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Genesee, F., Nicoladis, E., & Paradis, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 611-631
- ISSN
- 0305-0009 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7602
- OpenAlex
- W2139754385
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.