Defending the Authoritarian Regime Online: China's “Voluntary Fifty-cent Army”
Abstract
Recent studies on internet politics in China have gone beyond the once dominant control–liberalization perspective and directed intellectual attention to the varieties of online activism. Based on extensive in-depth online ethnographic work, this project explores the pluralization of online expression in Chinese cyberspace. Following a constituency of internet users who identify themselves as the “voluntary fifty-cent army,” the paper explores how these users acquire and consolidate their identity and combat criticism that targets the authoritarian regime. Analysis of the confrontational exchanges between the “voluntary fifty-cent army” and their opponents suggests that a perspective that goes beyond state censorship and regime-challenging activism is required in order to gain a better understanding of online expression in China. Close examination of why and how internet users may voluntarily defend the authoritarian regime also reveals how the dynamics in online discourse competition may work to the authoritarian regime's advantage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Paid users often help authorities with pro-government framing and manipulation.
“Oftentimes, this is done with the help of paid users (Han, 2015; King etal., 2017).”
From How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay (2020) · cites this paper as Han, 2015
Cites
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000014 · Cited by 2,415 · see citing works
A State-led Nationalism: The Patriotic Education Campaign in Post-Tiananmen China
Zhao, S. (1998) · Communist and Post-Communist Studies · doi:10.1016/s0967-067x(98)00009-9 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Access Denied The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering
Deibert, R., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., & Zittrain, J. L. (2008) · CrimRxiv · doi:10.21428/cb6ab371.9034e9f7 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Political Expression in the Chinese Blogosphere: Below the Radar
Esarey, A., & Qiang, X. (2008) · Asian Survey · doi:10.1525/as.2008.48.5.752 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Cyber-Nationalism in China: Challenging Western media portrayals of internet censorship in China
Jiang, Y. (2012) · doi:10.1017/9780987171894 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
17 WEAVING THE AUTHORITARIAN WEB The Control of Internet Use in Nondemocratic Regimes
Boas, T. C. (2006) · How Revolutionary Was the Digital Revolution? · doi:10.1515/9781503625730-021 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000144 · Cited by 1,028 · see citing works
How Dictators Control the Internet: A Review Essay
Keremoğlu, E., & Weidmann, N. B. (2020) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414020912278 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
- Authors
- Han, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Han, Rongbin
- ORCID
- Han, Rongbin
- Venue
- The China Quarterly
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-10-14
- Volume
- 224
- Pages
- 1006-1025
- ISSN
- 0009-4439 (ISSN-L)
- 0305-7410
- 1468-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2246281786
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 27.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The China Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Keywords
- digital activism, Chinese internet users, online speech, cyberspace, state censorship, digital ethnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review