Cited by 83Rangeland Management and Livestock EcologyAgricultural and Rural Development ResearchRangeland and Wildlife Management

Overstocking in the trans-Himalayan rangelands of India

Open access
Mishra, Charudutt, Prins, Herbert H.T., Wieren, Sipke E. van·2001·Environmental Conservation

Abstract

High livestock densities in rangelands can result in reduced animal production due either to overgrazing or reduced per caput food availability, yet evidence for reduced animal production due to overstocking is scarce. Here simple animal production models establish the occurrence of overstocking in a traditional agropastoral system in the Spiti Valley of the Indian Trans-Himalaya. Empirical data show that fecundity of adult female livestock is related to total livestock biomass density ( S ) as a negative linear function of S. Total herd production is modelled as a quadratic function of S , thereby calculating an optimum livestock biomass density ( S op ), at which total herd production is maximized. A sample of 40 villages showed that over 83% of Spiti's rangelands may be overstocked with values of S > S op . Overstocking seems to be a classic case of the tragedy of the commons, as livestock is individually owned while the land is communally grazed. Recent socio-economic changes have probably contributed to high levels of overstocking. Even areas within wildlife reserves are overstocked. Conservation management needs to focus on creation of grazing free areas and management of livestock densities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0376892901000297

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Competition between wild and domestic yaks, and possible disease transmission, are problems.

    “Competition between wild and domestic yaks, and possible disease transmission, are problems (Banks et al. 2003;Fox et al. 2002;Mishra et al. 2001)”

    From Bos grunniens and Bos mutus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2009) · cites this paper as Mishra et al. 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mishra, C., Prins, H. H. T., & Wieren, S. E. V.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Environmental Conservation
Published
2001-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
279-283
ISSN
  • 0376-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4387
OpenAlex
W2094536661
Cited by
83
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Rural Development Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
overstocking, rangeland, livestock density, animal husbandry, Spiti Valley, Trans-Himalaya, agropastoralism, tragedy of the commons, communal grazing, wildlife reserves, grazing management, conservation management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review