Cited by 191Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland Management and Livestock EcologyRangeland and Wildlife Management

Globalization of the Cashmere Market and the Decline of Large Mammals in Central Asia

BERGER, JOEL, BUUVEIBAATAR, BAYARBAATAR, MISHRA, CHARUDUTT·2013·Conservation Biology

Abstract

As drivers of terrestrial ecosystems, humans have replaced large carnivores in most areas, and human influence not only exerts striking ecological pressures on biodiversity at local scales but also has indirect effects in distant corners of the world. We suggest that the multibillion dollar cashmere industry creates economic motivations that link western fashion preferences for cashmere to land use in Central Asia. This penchant for stylish clothing, in turn, encourages herders to increase livestock production which affects persistence of over 6 endangered large mammals in these remote, arid ecosystems. We hypothesized that global trade in cashmere has strong negative effects on native large mammals of deserts and grassland where cashmere‐producing goats are raised. We used time series data, ecological snapshots of the biomass of native and domestic ungulates, and ecologically and behaviorally based fieldwork to test our hypothesis. In Mongolia increases in domestic goat production were associated with a 3‐fold increase in local profits for herders coexisting with endangered saiga (Saiga tatarica) . That increasing domestic grazing pressure carries fitness consequences was inferred on the basis of an approximately 4‐fold difference in juvenile recruitment among blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur) in trans‐Himalayan India. Across 7 study areas in Mongolia, India, and China's Tibetan Plateau, native ungulate biomass is now <5% that of domestic species. Such trends suggest ecosystem degradation and decreased capacity for the persistence of native species, including at least 8 Asian endemic species: saiga, chiru (Pantholops hodgsoni) , Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) , snow leopard (Panthera uncia) , khulan (Equus hemionus) , kiang (E. kiang) , takhi (E. przewalski ), and wild yak (Bos mutus ). Our results suggest striking yet indirect and unintended actions that link trophic‐level effects to markets induced by the trade for cashmere . Globalización del Mercado de Cachemira y la Declinación de Mamíferos Mayores en Asia Central

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cobi.12100

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A market economy can drive population changes, either by exerting a negative downward pressure or by encouraging northern communities to consider the economic potential and thus bolster conservation efforts.

    “A market economy can drive population changes, either by exerting a negative downward pressure (Berger et al. 2013), or by encouraging northern communities to consider the economic potential, and thus bolster conservation efforts.”

    From Muskox status, recent variation, and uncertain future (2020) · cites this paper as Berger et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BERGER, J., BUUVEIBAATAR, B., & MISHRA, C.
Affiliations
  • Division of Biological Sciences University of Montana, and Northern Rockies Field Office, Wildlife Conservation Society Missoula MT 59812 U.S.A
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • Nature Conservation Foundation (IN)
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-18
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
679-689
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W1568217162
Cited by
191
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
endangered ungulates, livestock grazing pressure, saiga, blue sheep, juvenile recruitment, ecosystem degradation, human-wildlife conflict, Trans-Himalayan region, Tibetan Plateau, Mongolia, Central Asia, wildlife trade, biodiversity loss
MeSH terms
Animals, Asia, Central, Commerce, Conservation of Natural Resources, Goats, Population Dynamics, Species Specificity, Wool, Biomass, Internationality, Endangered Species, Livestock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review