Cited by 10Frailty in Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Older men’s definitions of frailty – the Manitoba follow-up study

Open access
St. John, Philip D., McClement, Susan S., Swift, Audrey U., Tate, Robert B.·2019·Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ Introduction: Peu de recherches empiriques ont été réalisées sur les définitions non cliniques de la fragilité. Objectifs : 1. Explorer comment les hommes plus âgés définissent la fragilité, et 2. Explorer si ces définitions correspondent aux définitions cliniques de la fragilité qui sont couramment utilisées. Méthodes : Analyses des réponses à des questions ouvertes d’un sondage présenté dans le cadre d’une étude de cohorte prospective réalisée chez des hommes âgés qui avaient travaillé comme aviateurs. Les définitions de la fragilité ont été recueillies et groupées en fonction de thèmes. Résultats : 147 hommes (âge moyen : 93 ans) ont répondu au sondage. Une grande hétérogénéité a été observée dans les définitions de la fragilité recueillies chez ces participants, et aucun des thèmes de la fragilité ne pouvait être qualifié de prédominant. Les incapacités dans les activités de la vie quotidienne étaient le thème le plus fréquemment évoqué. Aucune correspondance ne pouvait être établie entre les définitions de la fragilité énoncées par les hommes âgés et les théories médicales couramment utilisées pour la fragilité. Conclusions : La plupart des hommes âgés pensent que la fragilité est un problème important, bien que leurs définitions de la fragilité diffèrent. La fragilité se manifesterait d’une manière hétérogène et affecterait différemment chaque individu.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980818000405

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to participating in community programming pre-dated the COVID-19 pandemic, as most community programs were offered in-person, posing a significant barrier for older adults who experience challenges with participating in activities outside of their homes.

    “Barriers to participating in community programming pre-dated the COVID-19 pandemic, as most community programs were offered in-person, posing a significant barrier for older adults who experience challenges with participating in activities outside of their homes (37–42).”

    From Telephone-based group mental health support for older adults in central Canada: pilot acceptability and effectiveness findings of The CONNECT Program (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Basore, J. W. (Ed.). Seneca. (1932). De Brevitate Vitae -"On the Shortness of Life". London, ENG: William Heinemann.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
St. John, P. D., McClement, S. S., Swift, A. U., & Tate, R. B.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2018-12-07
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
13-20
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
OpenAlex
W2905207666
Cited by
10
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
frailty, older men, activities of daily living
MeSH terms
Frailty, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aging, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Manitoba, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review