Cited by 25Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

Effects of waiting time on appointment attendance with clinical psychologists and length of treatment

Loumidis, Konstantinos S, Shropshire, Julia M·1997·Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Objective:With the increasing demand for clinical psychology services and the existing shortage of clinical psychologists, it is theoretically and clinically important to identify variables associated with non-attendance for clinical psychology appointments. The study reported here attempted to: (a) examine the effect of waiting time for an appointment on non-attendance to clinical psychology services; (b) investigate variables associated with prolonged waiting time; (c) explore the nature of the relationship between waiting time and length of psychological treatment. Method:The records of 49 3 patients offered an appointment to attend a clinical psychology service over a period of 24 months were analysed. Subsequently information on sex, age, type of referring problem, previous treatment history, treatment venue and waiting time for appointment, was collected and statistically analysed. Results:Non-attendance was significantly related to prolonged waiting time and young age. Controlling for the effects of waiting time and age, patients with complex problems and new patients wh o had never sought psychological treatment in the past were less likely to attend. Length of waiting time was higher in groups with previous treatment history, patients seen at a hospital based department, and patients with complex problems and anxiety disorders. Finally, length of psychological treatment (total number of sessions required) was not affected by prolonged waiting time. Conclusion:Non-attendance for clinical psychology appointments was associated with (a) young age, (b) prolonged waiting time (over six months), (c) complex psychological problems, and (d) new patients. The limitations and clinical implications of these findings are critically discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0790966700002986

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loumidis, K. S., & Shropshire, J. M.
Affiliations
  • North Manchester General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine
Published
1997-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
49-54
ISSN
  • 0790-9667 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-6967
OpenAlex
W2588030814
Cited by
25
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
appointment wait times, appointment non-attendance, clinical psychology services, patient age, anxiety disorders, treatment history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review