The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perspectives on Glyphosate Resistance
Abstract
The lack of evolution of weed resistance to the herbicide glyphosate has been considered from several perspectives. Few plant species are inherently resistant to glyphosate. Furthermore, the long history of extensive use of the herbicide has resulted in no verified instances of weeds evolving resistance under field situations. Unique properties of glyphosate such as its mode of action, metabolism, chemical structure and lack of residual activity in soil may explain this observation. Selection for glyphosate resistance of crops using intense whole plant and cell/tissue culture techniques, including mutagenesis, has had only limited success and is unlikely to be duplicated under normal field conditions. Information obtained in the development of glyphosate-resistant crops suggests that target-site alterations that decrease the herbicidal activity of glyphosate also may lead to reduced survival of a weed. In addition, the complex manipulations that were required for the development of glyphosate-resistant crops are unlikely to be duplicated in nature to evolve glyphosate-resistant weeds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metabolism and degradation of glyphosate in soil and water
Rueppel, M. L., Brightwell, B. B., Schaefer, J., & Marvel, J. T. (1977) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf60211a018 · Cited by 456
Cited by
Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide
Heap, I., & Duke, S. O. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4760 · Cited by 518
Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia
Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., & Hanna, W. W. (2006) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-06-001r.1 · Cited by 423
Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects
Qaim, M., & Traxler, G. (2005) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00006.x · Cited by 291
Molecular Biology of Weed Control
Gressel, J. (2002) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781482264708 · Cited by 276
Schütte, G., Eckerstorfer, M., Rastelli, V., Reichenbecher, W., Restrepo-Vassalli, S., Ruohonen-Lehto, M., Saucy, A.-G. W., & Mertens, M. (2017) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0100-y · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradshaw, L. D., Padgette, S. R., Kimball, S. L., & Wells, B. H.
- Venue
- Weed Technology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 189-198
- ISSN
- 0890-037X (ISSN-L)
- 1550-2740
- OpenAlex
- W2406494571
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspectives on Glyphosate Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0890037x00041567
- The paper
- Bradshaw, L. D., Padgette, S. R., Kimball, S. L., & Wells, B. H. (1997). Perspectives on Glyphosate Resistance. Weed Technology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890037x00041567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
