Cited by 163Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFood Safety and Hygiene

A population-based estimate of the burden of diarrhoeal illness in the United States: FoodNet, 1996–7

Open access
HERIKSTAD, H., YANG, S., VAN GILDER, T. J., VUGIA, D., HADLER, J., BLAKE, P., DENEEN, V., SHIFERAW, B. +2 more·2002·Epidemiology and Infection

Abstract

This study was performed to better understand and more precisely quantify the amount and burden of illness caused by acute diarrhoea in the United States today. A telephone-based population survey was conducted between 1 July, 1996, and 31 June, 1997, in sites of the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet). The overall prevalence of acute diarrhoea in the 4 weeks before interview was 11%, giving a rate of 1.4 episodes of diarrhoea per person per year. The rate of diarrhoeal illness defined as a diarrhoeal episode lasting longer than 1 day or which resulted in significant impairment of daily activities was 0.7 per person per year. It can be concluded that acute diarrhoea is common and represents a significant burden of illness in the United States. Our data on self-reported diarrhoea, when generalized to the entire nation, suggests 375 million episodes of acute diarrhoea each year in the United States. Many of these episodes are mild. However, our data also indicate that there are approximately 200 million episodes of diarrhoeal illness each year in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0950268801006628

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The symptoms, severity and duration of illness reported in the current study are similar to other studies, although the median duration and percentage of cases with bloody diarrhoea are at the lower end of the spectrum of reported results.

    “The symptoms, severity and duration of illness we report are similar to other studies [7, 9, 11, 13-16, 18], although the median duration and percentage of our cases with bloody diarrhoea are at the lower end of the spectrum of reported results.”

    From Burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in the Metropolitan region, Chile, 2008 (2011) · cites this paper as [18]

    The ‘Diarrhoea and diarrhoeal illness’ section (page not available) reports symptoms, a median diarrhoea duration of 2 days, and bloody diarrhoea in 0.9% of cases, making this paper a relevant comparator. It does not establish that the citing study’s median duration and percentage with bloody diarrhoea fall at the lower end of the range reported across studies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]2. Dingle JH, Badger GF, Jordan Jr WS. Gastrointestinal illnesses. In : Illness in the home. A study of 25 000 illness in a group of Cleveland families. Cleveland : The Press of Western Reserve University, 1964 : 189-90.
  2. [6]6. Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. Food- borne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (Food- Net). Emerg Infect Dis 1997 ; 3 : 581-3.
  3. [7]7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Food- borne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 1996. MMWR 1997 ; 46 : 258-61.
  4. [11]11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assess- ment of inadequately filtered public drinking water - Washington, D.C., December 1993. MMWR 1994 ; 43 : 661-3,669.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HERIKSTAD, H., YANG, S., VAN GILDER, T. J., VUGIA, D., HADLER, J., BLAKE, P., DENEEN, V., SHIFERAW, B., ANGULO, F. J., & THE FOODNET WORKING GROUP
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • California Health and Human Services Agency (US)
  • Connecticut Department of Public Health (US)
  • Georgia Department of Public Health (US)
  • Minnesota Department of Health (US)
Venue
Epidemiology and Infection
Published
2002-08
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
9-17
ISSN
  • 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4409
OpenAlex
W2156582021
Cited by
163
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
Keywords
acute diarrhea, prevalence, FoodNet, population survey, disease burden estimation, United States
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Child, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Prevalence, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review