Cited by 76Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologySalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyGlobal Health and Epidemiology

Population distribution and burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in British Columbia, Canada

Open access
Thomas, M Kate, Majowicz, Shannon E, MacDougall, Laura, Sockett, Paul N, Kovacs, Suzie J, Fyfe, Murray, Edge, Victoria L, Doré, Kathryn +3 more·2006·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In developed countries, gastrointestinal illness (GI) is typically mild and self-limiting, however, it has considerable economic impact due to high morbidity. METHODS: The magnitude and distribution of acute GI in British Columbia (BC), Canada was evaluated via a cross-sectional telephone survey of 4,612 randomly selected residents, conducted from June 2002 to June 2003. Respondents were asked if they had experienced vomiting or diarrhoea in the 28 days prior to the interview. RESULTS: A response rate of 44.3% was achieved. A monthly prevalence of 9.2% (95% CI 8.4-10.0), an incidence rate of 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.4) episodes of acute GI per person-year, and an average probability that an individual developed illness in the year of 71.6% (95% CI 68.0-74.8), weighted by population size were observed. The average duration of illness was 3.7 days, translating into 19.2 million days annually of acute GI in BC. CONCLUSION: The results corroborate those from previous Canadian and international studies, highlighting the substantial burden of acute GI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-6-307

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The symptoms, severity and duration of illness reported in the current study are similar to other studies, although the median duration and percentage of cases with bloody diarrhoea are at the lower end of the spectrum of reported results.

    “The symptoms, severity and duration of illness we report are similar to other studies [7, 9, 11, 13-16, 18], although the median duration and percentage of our cases with bloody diarrhoea are at the lower end of the spectrum of reported results.”

    From Burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in the Metropolitan region, Chile, 2008 (2011) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results (Symptoms and severity; page unavailable) report symptoms, severity, an average illness duration of 3.7 days, and bloody diarrhoea in 5.3% of respondents with diarrhoea. These figures provide a basis for comparison, but the source does not report a median illness duration or establish that its duration and bloody-diarrhoea percentage fall at the lower end of results across studies. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The percentages of cases reported in the current study that sought medical care and submitted a stool sample are at the low end of the range of percentages reported from other studies.

    “Similarly, percentages of cases reported here that sought medical care and submitted a stool sample are at the low end of the range of percentages reported from other studies [7, 11, 14-16, 18].”

    From Burden of acute gastrointestinal illness in the Metropolitan region, Chile, 2008 (2011) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results section (Health care seeking behaviour; page unavailable) reports that 11.6% of cases visited a health care provider and ten submitted a stool sample. These figures make the paper a relevant comparison study, but it does not establish that the citing study’s percentages fall at the low end of a range across studies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The survey tool was developed by modifying survey tools used previously in Argentina and using other similar cross-sectional population burden-of-GI studies as models.

    “The survey tool (available from the author upon request) was developed by modifying the survey tools used previously in Argentina [21] and using other similar cross-sectional population burden of GI studies as models [7, 9, 11, 13-16].”
  • The survey tool was developed by modifying survey tools used previously in Argentina and using other similar cross-sectional population burden-of-GI studies as models.

    “The survey tool (available from the author upon request) was developed by modifying the survey tools used previously in Argentina [21] and using other similar cross-sectional population burden of GI studies as models [7, 9, 11, 13-16].”
  • The percentages of cases reported in the current study that sought medical care and submitted a stool sample are at the low end of the range of percentages reported from other studies.

    “Similarly, percentages of cases reported here that sought medical care and submitted a stool sample are at the low end of the range of percentages reported from other studies [7, 11, 14-16, 18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rothman KJ Greenland S Modern Epidemiology 1998 2 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott-Raven Publishers
  2. Majowicz SE Hall G Scallan E Adak GK Gauci C Jones T O'Brien S Henao O Sockett PN Development of a common symptom-based case definition for gastroenteritis: An international analysis [abstract] Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006 2006 193

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, M. K., Majowicz, S. E., MacDougall, L., Sockett, P. N., Kovacs, S. J., Fyfe, M., Edge, V. L., Doré, K., Flint, J. A., Henson, S., & Jones, A. Q.
Affiliations
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
  • BC Centre for Disease Control (CA)
  • Island Health (CA)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Thomas, M Kate
  • Jones, Andria Q
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2006-12
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
307-307
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165191561
Cited by
76
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • Public Health Agency
  • Health Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Global Health and Epidemiology
Keywords
acute gastrointestinal illness, diarrhea, vomiting, prevalence, incidence, disease burden, disease duration, population distribution, British Columbia
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, British Columbia, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diarrhea, Female, Gastroenteritis, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vomiting, Incidence, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review