Cited by 193Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Niche separation between the maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), the crab‐eating fox (Dusicyon thous) and the hoary fox (Dusicyon vetulus) in central Brazil

de Almeida Jácomo, Anah Tereza, Silveira, Leandro, Diniz‐Filho, José Alexandre Felizola·2004·Journal of Zoology

Abstract

Four species of canids occur in the Cerrado of central Brazil. Three of them, the maned wolf Chrysocyon brachyurus, the crab‐eating fox Dusicyon thous and the hoary fox Dusicyon vetulus, were studied in Emas National Park between 1996 and 1999 to investigate niche separation. The diet of the three species was studied to understand niche breadth and degree of overlap. Habitat and activity patterns were used as second and third ecological parameters to define niche dimensions, and were estimated using camera‐trap data. The maned wolf is the largest species, weighing c. 21 kg, and is about three times larger than the crab‐eating fox and six times larger than the hoary fox. The major ecological differences between the three species were found in their food niche and habitat use, where crab‐eating fox presented higher differences from the hoary fox (Pianka's index of niche overlap (O) = 0.405). Despite differences in niche breadth, habitat use between the hoary fox and the maned wolf were more similar, explaining their larger overlap, in comparison with habitat use by the crab‐eating fox. Activity patterns among the species showed less divergence. The three species presented two activity peaks, one in the dusk–night period and another in the morning period. These data permit a better understanding of the ecological separation of the three Cerrado canids that enables their coexistence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0952836903004473

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among animal matter, mammals are the most consumed; rodents and armadillos are often found in the scats, while insects are seldom consumed.

    “Among animal matter, mammals are the most consumed; rodents and armadillos are often found in the scats, while insects are seldom consumed (Dietz 1984;Silva and Talamoni 2003;De Almeida Jácomo et al. 2004).”

    From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as De Almeida Jácomo et al. 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Almeida Jácomo, A. T., Silveira, L., & Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de Brasília (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Corresponding author
Diniz‐Filho, José Alexandre Felizola
Venue
Journal of Zoology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
262
Issue
1
Pages
99-106
ISSN
  • 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7998
OpenAlex
W2098398745
Cited by
193
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Memphis Zoo
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
niche differentiation, maned wolf, Cerdocyon thous, diet overlap, habitat use, activity patterns, species coexistence, Emas National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review