The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prey preferences of the lion (Panthera leo)
Abstract
Abstract LionsPanthera leoare generally thought to prey on medium to large ungulates. Knowledge of which species are actually preferred and which are avoided is lacking, however, as is an understanding of why such preference or avoidance may arise. An analysis of 32 studies over 48 different spatial locations or temporal periods throughout the distribution of the lion shows that it preferentially preys upon species within a weight range of 190–550 kg. The most preferred weight of lion prey is 350 kg. The mean mass of significantly preferred prey species is 290 kg and of all preferred species is 201 kg. Gemsbok, buffalo, wildebeest, giraffe and zebra are significantly preferred. Species outside the preferred weight range are generally avoided. Species within the preferred weight range that are not significantly preferred (such as roan, sable and eland) generally have features that reduce predation either morphologically (e.g. sable horns), ecologically (e.g. roan and sable occurring at low density), or behaviourally (e.g. the large herd size and increased vigilance of eland). Warthog are below the preferred weight range yet are taken in accordance with their availability and this is probably due to their sympatry with lion, their relatively slow evasion speed and their lower level of vigilance. Plots of prey preference against prey body mass follows a bell curve with a right skew that, we argue, is caused by collective hunting by lions of larger‐bodied prey. Our methods can be used on all large predators and are likely to be useful in assessing competition in sympatric communities of predators, cooperative hunting and predicting predator diets. This will allow us to move beyond descriptive dietary studies to improve our predictive understanding of the mechanisms underlying predator–prey interactions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Whereas buffalo are a preferred prey species in several savanna ecosystems [21,57,58], they constituted less than 5% of kills found during our study, and less than 1% of male kills (Table 5), despite male lions specifically targeting buffalo elsewhere [52].”
From Effects of Vegetation Structure on the Location of Lion Kill Sites in African Thicket (2016) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“Instead of typical target species such as buffalo and zebra [57], half the kills made in Addo consisted of kudu and ostrich, species which are usually killed in proportion to their abundance (kudu) or actively avoided (ostrich) [57].”
From Effects of Vegetation Structure on the Location of Lion Kill Sites in African Thicket (2016) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Parry, G. D. R., Johnson, M. S., Bell, R. M., Edwards, R. W., & Wathern, P. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3045-3_3 · Cited by 7,605
Nowak, R. (1999) · doi:10.56021/9780801857898 · Cited by 4,102
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506
Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and Tests
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., & Charnov, E. L. (1977) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409852 · Cited by 3,353
Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach
Pulliam, H. R. (1979) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(79)90082-4 · Cited by 2,001
Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes
Farris, D. A., Ivlev, V. S., & Scott, D. (1962) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1439522 · Cited by 1,759
Quantitative measurement of food selection
Jacobs, J. (1974) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00384581 · Cited by 1,651
Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn.
Watkinson, A. R., & Zar, J. H. (1996) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404706 · Cited by 1,300
Survival in small intestinal adenocarcinoma
Zar, N., Holmberg, L., Wilander, E., & Rastad, J. (1996) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00244-4 · Cited by 1,243
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bertram B. C. R., 1979, Serengeti I: dynamics of an ecosystem, 221
- Beyers C. P. de L., 1964, Lion vs buffalo, Animal, 5, 220
- Bourliere F., 1963, Specific feeding habits of African carnivores, Afr. Wildl, 17, 21
- Bridgeford P., 1985, Unusual diet of the lion Panthera leo in the Skeleton Coast Park, Madoqua, 14, 187
- Dowsett R. J., 1966, Wet season game populations and biomass in the Ngoma area of the Kafue National Park, Puku, 4, 135
- Elliot W. M., 1987, Possible predation of a black rhinoceros calf by a lion, Lammergeyer, 38, 68
- Estes R. D., 1999, The safari companion: a guide to watching African mammals
- Ewer R. F., 1973, The carnivores
- Hanby J. P., 1991, Great cats, 80
- Joslin P., 1984, The environmental limitations and future of the Asiatic lion, J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc, 81, 648
- Kingdon J., 1984, The encyclopedia of mammals, 486
- Kruuk H., 1975, Function and evolution in behaviour, 119
- Maddock A., 1996, Changes in lion number sin Hluhluwe‐Umfolozi Park, Lammergeyer, 44, 6
- Mangani B., 1962, Buffalo kills lion, Afr. Wildl, 16, 27
- Saba A. R. K., 1979, Wildlife management in savanna woodland, 41
- Schaller G. B., 1972, The Serengeti lion
- Scheel D., 1995, Serengeti II: dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem, 299
- Sinclair A. R. E., 1995, Serengeti II: dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem, 3
- Sinclair A. R. E., 1995, Serengeti II: dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem, 194
- Steele N. A., 1970, A preliminary report on the lions in the Umfolozi and Hluhluwe Game Reserves, Lammergeyer, 11, 68
- Viljoen P. C., 1993, The effects of changes in prey availability on lion predation in a natural ecosystem in northern Botswana, Symp. zool. Soc. Lond, 193
- Whateley A., 1985, The carnivores of the Hluhluwe and Umfolozi Game Reserves: 1973–1982, Lammergeyer, 35, 1
- Wilson V. J., 1981, Lions, leopards and lynxs
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prey preferences of the leopard ( Panthera pardus )
Hayward, M. W., Henschel, P., O’Brien, J., Hofmeyr, M., Balme, G. A., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2006) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00139.x · Cited by 615
Self-citationKissui, B. M. (2008) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00199.x · Cited by 392
Hopcraft, J. G. C., Olff, H., & SINCLAIR, A. R. E. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.001 · Cited by 403
Predator–prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web
Owen‐Smith, N., & Mills, M. G. L. (2008) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01314.x · Cited by 374
Carrying capacity of large African predators: Predictions and tests
Hayward, M. W., O’Brien, J., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.018 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayward, M. W., & Kerley, G. I. H.
- Affiliations
- Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Hayward, Matt W.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-322
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W2152283858
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- lion, prey selection, prey avoidance, ungulate prey, collective hunting, predator-prey interactions, predator diet, sympatric predators, warthog, gemsbok, buffalo, wildebeest, giraffe, zebra, Roan, sable, eland, sustained attention, herd size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
