Cited by 328Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nature × nurture: Genetic vulnerabilities interact with physical maltreatment to promote conduct problems

Open access

Abstract

Maltreatment places children at risk for psychiatric morbidity, especially conduct problems. However, not all maltreated children develop conduct problems. We tested whether the effect of physical maltreatment on risk for conduct problems was strongest among those who were at high genetic risk for these problems using data from the E-risk Study, a representative cohort of 1,116 5-year-old British twin pairs and their families. Children's conduct problems were ascertained via parent and teacher interviews. Physical maltreatment was ascertained via parent report. Children's genetic risk for conduct problems was estimated as a function of their co-twin's conduct disorder status and the pair's zygosity. The effect of maltreatment on risk for conduct problems was strongest among those at high genetic risk. The experience of maltreatment was associated with an increase of 2% in the probability of a conduct disorder diagnosis among children at low genetic risk for conduct disorder but an increase of 24% among children at high genetic risk. Prediction of behavioral pathology can attain greater accuracy if both pathogenic environments and genetic risk are ascertained. Certain genotypes may promote resistance to trauma. Physically maltreated children whose first-degree relatives engage in antisocial behavior warrant priority for therapeutic intervention. We are grateful to the Study mothers and fathers, the twins, and the twins' teachers for their participation. Our thanks to Robert Plomin for his contributions; to Thomas Achenbach for generous permission to adapt the CBCL; to Tom Price for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript; to Hallmark Cards for their support; and to members of the E-Risk team for their dedication, hard work, and insights. The E-Risk Study is funded by Medical Research Council Grant G9806489. Terrie Moffitt is a Royal Society–Wolfson Research Merit Award holder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579405050042

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Widom, C. S. , & Maxfield, M. G. (2001).An update on the “cycle of violence”(NCJ 184894).Washington, DC:National Institute of Justice. · DOI
  2. American Psychiatric Association .(1994).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(4th ed.).Washington, DC:Author.
  3. Jaffee, S. R. (in press).Family violence and parent psychopathology: Implications forchildren's socioemotional development and resilience. In S. Goldstein & R. Brooks (Eds.),Handbook of resilience in children.New York:Kluwer.
  4. Potter, L. B. , & Mercy, J. A. (1997).Public health perspective on interpersonal violence among youths inthe United States.In D. M. Stoff , J. Breiling , & J. D. Maser (Eds.),Handbook of antisocial behavior (pp.3–11).New York:Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–326 of 326

Metadata

Authors
JAFFEE, S. R., CASPI, A., MOFFITT, T. E., DODGE, K. A., RUTTER, M., TAYLOR, A., & TULLY, L. A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2005-03
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
67-84
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2110622864
Cited by
328
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
30.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (L330 25 3002)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K05DA015226)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
physical abuse, child abuse, conduct problems, conduct disorder, genetic risk, gene-environment interaction, twin pairs, zygosity, antisocial behavior, early childhood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Child, Child Abuse, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Development, Diseases in Twins, Female, Genotype, Humans, Life Change Events, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Comorbidity, Conduct Disorder, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review