The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in bird communities following conversion of lowland forest to oil palm and rubber plantations in southern Thailand
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes changes in bird communities following the conversion of lowland forest to commercial oil palm and rubber plantations. Conversion of forest to plantations resulted in a reduction in species richness of at least 60%, with insectivores and frugivores suffering greater losses than more omnivorous species. Of the 128 species recorded across all habitats, 84% were recorded in forest, and 60% were recorded only in that habitat. Of the 16 Globally Threatened or Near-Threatened species recorded in the study, 15 were recorded only in forest. Species occurring in plantations were significantly more widespread in Thailand than species recorded only in forests and had a tendency towards smaller body size. Species richness in plantations was unaffected by plantation age or distance from nearest forest edge, but was significantly greater where undergrowth was allowed to regenerate beneath the crop trees. Bird communities in oil palm and rubber plantations were extremely similar, and there was a strong positive correlation across species in their relative abundance in each plantation type. The results indicate that a high proportion of species formerly present in the region are unable to adapt to conversion of forest to oil palm and rubber plantations, resulting in large losses of bird species and family richness and the replacement of species with restricted ranges and high conservation status by those with extensive ranges and low conservation status. Initiatives that reduce pressure to clear new land for plantations, for example by increasing productivity in existing plantations and improving protected area networks, are likely to be more effective in conserving threatened forest birds than initiatives to improve conditions within plantations, though both should be encouraged.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature
Green, R. E., Cornell, S. J., Scharlemann, J. P. W., & Balmford, A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106049 · Cited by 2,238
Statistical computing: An introduction to data analysis using s-plus
(2003) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(03)80131-1 · Cited by 1,919
MORRIS, S. R. (2001) · The Wilson Bulletin · doi:10.1676/0043-5643(2001)113[0468:]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,830
Simberloff, D. (2001) · The Auk · doi:10.1093/auk/118.4.1112 · Cited by 1,076
Abundance–occupancy relationships
Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., Greenwood, J. J. D., Gregory, R. D., Quinn, R. M., & Lawton, J. H. (2000) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00485.x · Cited by 885
Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests
Hartley, M. J. (2002) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00549-7 · Cited by 717
Biodiversity Impacts of Some Agricultural Commodity Production Systems
Donald, P. F. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.01803.x · Cited by 650
Self-citationThreatened Birds of Asia; The BirdLife International Red Data Book
Collar, N., Андреев, А. В., Chan, S., Crosby, M. J., Subramanya, S., & Tobias, J. A. (2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 637
World agriculture and the environment: a commodity-by-commodity guide to impacts and practices
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-1539 · Cited by 393
Effects of Land Use on Bird Species Richness in Sulawesi, Indonesia
WALTERT, M., MARDIASTUTI, A., & MÜHLENBERG, M. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00127.x · Cited by 196
Cited by
The impacts of oil palm on recent deforestation and biodiversity loss
Vijay, V., Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., & Smith, S. J. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159668 · Cited by 782
Navjot's nightmare revisited: logging, agriculture, and biodiversity in Southeast Asia
Wilcove, D. S., Giam, X., Edwards, D. P., Fisher, B., & Koh, L. P. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.005 · Cited by 506
Conserving Southeast Asian forest biodiversity in human-modified landscapes
Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Clements, R., Wanger, T. C., Hill, J. K., Hamer, K. C., Clough, Y., Tscharntke, T., Posa, M. R. C., & Lee, T. M. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.029 · Cited by 386
A review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system
Dislich, C., Keyel, A. C., Salecker, J., Kisel, Y., Meyer, K. M., Auliya, M., Barnes, A. D., Corre, M. D., Darras, K., Faust, H., et al. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12295 · Cited by 373
Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state‐of‐the‐art review
Immerzeel, D. J., Verweij, P. A., van der Hilst, F., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12067 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- ARATRAKORN, S., THUNHIKORN, S., & DONALD, P. F.
- Venue
- Bird Conservation International
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-82
- ISSN
- 0959-2709 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0001
- OpenAlex
- W1972254268
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in bird communities following conversion of lowland forest to oil palm and rubber plantations in southern Thailand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0959270906000062
- The paper
- ARATRAKORN, S., THUNHIKORN, S., & DONALD, P. F. (2006). Changes in bird communities following conversion of lowland forest to oil palm and rubber plantations in southern Thailand. Bird Conservation International. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959270906000062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.