The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation
Open accessAbstract
There is a great need for increased use and further development of automated sound recording and analysis of avian sounds. Birds are critical to ecosystem functioning so techniques to make avian monitoring more efficient and accurate will greatly benefit science and conservation efforts. We provide an overview of the hardware approaches to automated sound recording as well as an overview of the prominent techniques used in software to automatically detect and classify avian sound. We provide a comparative summary of examples of three general categories of hardware solutions for automating sound recording which include a hardware interface for a scheduling timer to control a standalone commercial recorder, a programmable recording device, and a single board computer. We also describe examples of the two main approaches to improving microphone performance for automated recorders through small arrays of microphone elements and using waveguides. For the purposes of thinking about automated sound analysis, we suggest five basic sound fragment types of avian sound and discuss a variety of techniques to automatically detect and classify avian sounds to species level, as well as their limitations. A variety of the features to measure for the various call types are provided, along with a variety of classification methods for those features. They are discussed in context of general performance as well as the monitoring and conservation efforts they are used in.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Howe, H. F., & Smallwood, J. (1982) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001221 · Cited by 3,545
(1992) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03531-4 · Cited by 2,991
Occupancy Estimation and Modeling. Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence
Yoccoz, N. G. (2006) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[450:oeamip]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,300
Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence
MacKenzie, D. I. (2005) · Cited by 1,878
Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain
Pounds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L., & Campbell, J. H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19297 · Cited by 1,429
ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS
Royle, J. A., & Nichols, J. D. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0777:eafrpa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,364
Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds
Ralph, C. J., Geupel, G. R., Pyle, P., Martin, T. E., & DeSante, D. F. (1993) · doi:10.2737/psw-gtr-144 · Cited by 1,072
Birds to Watch 2: The World List of Threatened Birds
Collar, N. J., Crosby, M. J., & Stattersfield, A. J. (1996) · Colonial Waterbirds · doi:10.2307/1521829 · Cited by 677
Assessment of Counting Techniques
Verner, J. (1985) · Current Ornithology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2385-3_8 · Cited by 448
Community Organization Among Neotropical Nectar-Feeding Birds
FEINSINGER, P., & COLWELL, R. K. (1978) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/18.4.779 · Cited by 445
Cited by
Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies
Valletta, J. J., Torney, C., Kings, M., Thornton, A., & Madden, J. (2017) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.005 · Cited by 505
“Classification of calls from different species and subspecies is robust (Fagerlund, 2007; Kershenbaum et al., 2016) and permits assessment of community structure (e.g. frogs: Taylor, Watson, Grigg,&McCallum,1996; birds: Brandes, 2008).”
Real-time bioacoustics monitoring and automated species identification
Aide, T. M., Corrada-Bravo, C., Campos-Cerqueira, M., Milan, C., Vega, G., & Alvarez, R. (2013) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.103 · Cited by 487
Towsey, M., Wimmer, J., Williamson, I., & Roe, P. (2014) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.007 · Cited by 369
Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness
Wimmer, J., Towsey, M., Roe, P., & Williamson, I. (2013) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/12-2088.1 · Cited by 272
Bioacoustic monitoring of animal vocal behavior for conservation
Teixeira, D., Maron, M., & van Rensburg, B. J. (2019) · Conservation Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/csp2.72 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott Brandes, T.
- Venue
- Bird Conservation International
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-08-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S163-S173
- ISSN
- 0959-2709 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0001
- OpenAlex
- W2117863804
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0959270908000415
- The paper
- Scott Brandes, T. (2008). Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation. Bird Conservation International. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959270908000415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.