Cited by 91Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and CortisolPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Cross-institutional assessment of stress responses in zoo animals using longitudinal monitoring of faecal corticoids and behaviour

Shepherdson, DJ, Carlstead, KC, Wielebnowski, N·2004·Animal Welfare

Abstract

Cross-institutional studies that combine non-invasive physiological measures of stress responses and the assessment of individual differences in behaviour and temperament have great potential as tools for assessing the well-being of zoo animals and for identifying key environmental stimuli relevant to well-being. In addition, such studies allow comparison of animals under a wide variety of conditions and enable researchers to obtain sufficiently large samples sizes for statistical data analyses. Faecal corticoid measurements, a method recently developed to monitor adrenal activity in wildlife and domestic species, can be obtained non-invasively as part of the normal husbandry routine. While basic techniques still need improvement, and interpretation of the acquired measures can be challenging, assessment of faecal corticoid concentrations can provide a useful indicator of stress responses under a variety of captive conditions. Here we report on three studies that illustrate this approach and the results that can be obtained. An on-going study reveals significant differences in the pattern of variability of faecal corticoid concentrations between polar bears that are reported by keepers to perform stereotypic behaviour and those that do not. In another study, faecal corticoid measures indicated that stress responses to certain extraneous noises might interfere with the breeding of Hawaiian honeycreepers in captivity. In a study of clouded leopards, higher faecal corticoid conc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0962728600014445

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physiological stress in zoo animals is commonly measured through faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGM) concentrations because of its non-invasive sampling technique.

    “Physiological stress in zoo animals is commonly measured through faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGM) concentrations because of its non-invasive sampling technique [26].”
  • Faecal sampling offers the advantage of representing the average glucocorticoid metabolite concentration output over hours or days and represents pooled quantities of glucocorticoid secretion from the adrenal medulla, dampening pulsatile effects.

    “This technique offers the advantage of representing the average GC metabolite concentration output over hours or days [69] and, therefore, represents pooled quantities of GC secretion from the adrenal medulla (i.e., baseline plasma GC), dampening pulsatile effects [67,70].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shepherdson, D., Carlstead, K., & Wielebnowski, N.
Affiliations
Brookfield Zoo Chicago (US)
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2004-02
Volume
13
Issue
S1
Pages
S105-S113
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W3114481733
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
stress response, zoo animals, animal welfare, captive animals, polar bear, stereotypy, Hawaiian honeycreepers, clouded leopard, individual differences in behavior, non-invasive physiological monitoring, inter-institutional comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review