Cited by 471Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMedical and Health Sciences ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Telemedicine practice: Review of the current ethical and legal challenges

Open access
Nittari, Giulio, Khuman, Ravjyot, Baldoni, Simone, Pallotta, Graziano, Battineni, Gopi, Sirignano, Ascanio, Amenta, Francesco, Ricci, Giovanna·2020·Telemedicine and e-Health

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine involves medical practice and information and communications technology. It has been proven to be very effective for remote health care, especially in areas with poor provision of health facilities. However, implementation of these technologies is often hampered by various issues. Among these, ethical and legal concerns are some of the more complex and diverse ones. In this study, an analysis of scientific literature was carried out to identify the ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine. Materials and Methods: English literature, published between 2010 and 2019, was searched on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science by using keywords, including “Telemedicine,” “Ethics,” “Malpractice,” “Telemedicine and Ethics,” “Telemedicine and Informed consent,” and “telemedicine and malpractice.” Different types of articles were analyzed, including research articles, review articles, and qualitative studies. The abstracts were evaluated according to the selection criteria, using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale criteria, and the final analysis led to the inclusion of 22 articles. Discussion: From the aforementioned sample, we analyzed elements that may be indicative of the efficacy of telemedicine in an adequate time frame. Ethical aspects such as informed consent, protection data, confidentiality, physician's malpractice, and liability and telemedicine regulations were considered. Conclusions: Our objective was to highlight the current status and identify what still needs to be implemented in telemedicine with respect to ethical and legal standards. Gaps emerged between current legislation, legislators, service providers, different medical services, and most importantly patient interaction with his/her data and the use of that data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/tmj.2019.0158

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many countries were unprepared for teletherapy due to lacking legal frameworks, lacking prior approval, and lacking clarity concerning cost coverage or reimbursement.

    “Although teletherapy generally seems to be beneficial (35, 36), many countries were unprepared for it due to lacking legal frameworks, lacking prior approval on the conductance of teletherapy by legal authorities and professional organizations, and lacking clarity concerning cost coverage or reimbursement (22).”

    From Radical Acceptance of Reality: Putting DBT®-A Skill Groups Online During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Conclusions say telemedicine legislation is lacking or absent in many cases, and the Summary of Article Pool reports gaps in insurance coverage and reimbursement guidance. These findings concern telemedicine broadly rather than teletherapy specifically. The cited paper does not establish that many countries lacked prior approval for teletherapy from legal authorities or professional organizations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A review of 2010-2020 literature indicated that a twelve-year-old observation still held: current measures often ignore ethical issues concerning professional conduct and relationships, patient autonomy and safety, cultural diversity, and human values.

    “However, this review indicated that a twelve year old observation still held: “Current measures often ignore ethical issues linked to professional conduct and relationships, protection of patient autonomy, patient safety, cultural diversity, and the human value system [42].””

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nittari, G., Khuman, R., Baldoni, S., Pallotta, G., Battineni, G., Sirignano, A., Amenta, F., & Ricci, G.
Affiliations
Università di Camerino (IT)
Corresponding author
Nittari, Giulio
Venue
Telemedicine and e-Health
Published
2020-12
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
1427-1437
ISSN
  • 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3669
OpenAlex
W3006523342
Cited by
471
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 34
FWCI
50.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Unicam Scientific Publications (University of Camerino) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
telemedicine, medical ethics, legal challenges, malpractice, informed consent, patient data confidentiality, data protection, physician liability, telemedicine regulation, remote care
MeSH terms
Information Technology, Confidentiality, Female, Humans, Informed Consent, Male, Malpractice, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review