Cited by 126Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Anticonvulsants for the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a literature review

Open access
Konovalov, Sergiy, Muralee, Sunanda, Tampi, Rajesh R.·2007·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

Objective To review and summarize the currently available data on the use of anticonvulsant mood stabilizers (carbamazepine, valproic acid, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate) in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD); to determine whether these medications can be recommended for routine clinical use. Methods Literature search in five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and COCHRANE collaboration) and analysis of the randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trials found therein. Results A total of seven RCTs were identified (two for carbamazepine and five for valproate). One study showed statistically significant improvement of BPSD in the medication group in comparison to the placebo group; five studies showed no significant differences; one study showed statistically significant worsening of the symptoms in the medication group vs. placebo. The majority of the studies reported significantly more frequent adverse effects in the medication group. Conclusion Although clearly beneficial in some patients, anticonvulsant mood stabilizers cannot be recommended for routine use in the treatment of BPSD at the present time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610207006540

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of valproic acid and derivatives have not shown treatment benefits for patients with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.

    “Studies of valproic acid and derivatives have not shown treatment benefits for patients with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.142”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konovalov, S., Muralee, S., & Tampi, R. R.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Tampi, Rajesh R.
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
293-308
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169929517
Cited by
126
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
anticonvulsant mood stabilizers, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, carbamazepine, valproic acid, gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, adverse drug reactions, dementia treatment
MeSH terms
Gabapentin, Lamotrigine, Aggression, Amines, Anticonvulsants, Carbamazepine, Cognition Disorders, Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids, Dementia, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Disorders, Triazines, Valproic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review