Cited by 36Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesTreatment of Major Depression

Use of Low-Dose Gabapentin for Aggressive Behavior in Vascular and Mixed Vascular/Alzheimer Dementia

Cooney, Colm, Murphy, Sinead, Tessema, Hiberet, Freyne, Aideen·2013·The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Abstract

Recent reports highlighting serious adverse effects of antipsychotic medication in behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) has led to calls for research on alternative agents. The authors describe the use of low-dose gabapentin to treat seven patients with a diagnosis of ICD-10 vascular or Mixed Vascular/Alzheimer Dementia with serious aggressive behavior. All seven patients had impressive and clinically significant responses to treatment. Treatment was tolerated in each case without adverse reactions. Our findings suggest that gabapentin should be considered for treating aggressive behavior in patients with vascular or mixed dementia and that it is well tolerated in this context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.12050115

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anti-epileptic drug gabapentin, which inhibits BCATc, has proved successful in treating behavioural alterations in subjects with AD.

    “In addition, the anti-epileptic drug gabapentin, which inhibits BCATc, has proved successful in treating behavioural alterations in subjects with AD (Cooney et al. 2013; Supasitthumrong et al. 2019).”

    From Alzheimer’s disease: Targeting the glutamatergic system (2020) · cites this paper as Cooney et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooney, C., Murphy, S., Tessema, H., & Freyne, A.
Affiliations
  • St. Vincent's University Hospital (IE)
  • From the Dept. of Old Age Psychiatry, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Venue
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Published
2013-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
120-125
ISSN
  • 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7222
OpenAlex
W2156053290
Cited by
36
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 6
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
gabapentin, aggression, vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, antipsychotic alternatives, treatment tolerability
MeSH terms
Gabapentin, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aggression, Alzheimer Disease, Amines, Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Dementia, Vascular, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review