Cited by 31Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsCongenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery

Neonatal management and outcomes of prenatally diagnosed CHDs

Bensemlali, Myriam, Bajolle, Fanny, Laux, Daniela, Parisot, Pauline, Ladouceur, Magalie, Fermont, Laurent, Lévy, Marilyne, Le Bidois, Jérôme +5 more·2017·Cardiology in the Young

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the probability of intervention at birth after prenatal diagnosis of CHD. Methods: A 10-year retrospective study including all foetuses with a prenatally diagnosed CHD and those delivered in a tertiary-care cardiac centre between January, 2002 and December, 2011 was carried out. Patients were classified into eight groups according to the anticipated risk of neonatal intervention. Results: The need for urgent intervention and/or PGE1 infusion within the first 48 hours of life was 47% (n=507/1080): 72% (n=248) for CHD at risk for a Rashkind procedure, 77% (n=72) for CHD with ductal-dependent pulmonary flow, 13% (n=22) for CHD with potentially ductal-dependent pulmonary flow, 94% (n=62) for CHD with ductal-dependent systemic flow, 29% (n=88) for CHD with potentially ductal-dependant systemic flow, 50% (n=4) for total anomalous pulmonary venous connection, and 17% (n=1) for CHD with atrio-ventricular block. In all, 34% of the patients received PGE1 infusion and 21.4% underwent urgent catheter-based or surgical interventions; 10% of patients without anticipated risk (n=10) underwent an early intervention; 6.7% (n=73) of the patients died; and 55% (n=589) had an intervention before discharge from hospital. Conclusion: Half of the neonates with foetal CHD benefited from an urgent intervention or PGE1 infusion at birth. We recommend scheduled delivery and in utero transfer for transposition of the great arteries, double-outlet right ventricle with sub-pulmonary ventricular septal defect, total anomalous pulmonary venous connection, CHD with atrio-ventricular block with heart rate <50, all ductal-dependant lesions, and CHD with potentially ductal-dependant systemic flow.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1047951116000639

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bensemlali, M., Bajolle, F., Laux, D., Parisot, P., Ladouceur, M., Fermont, L., Lévy, M., Le Bidois, J., Raimondi, F., Ville, Y., Salomon, L. J., Boudjemline, Y., & Bonnet, D.
Affiliations
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
Corresponding author
Bensemlali, Myriam
Venue
Cardiology in the Young
Published
2016-05-26
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
344-353
ISSN
  • 1047-9511 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-1107
OpenAlex
W2407150449
Cited by
31
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiology in the Young (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
Keywords
congenital heart disease, prenatal diagnosis, neonatal interventions, transposition of the great arteries, double outlet right ventricle, total anomalous pulmonary venous connection, atrioventricular block, Rashkind procedure, neonatal mortality, scheduled delivery, in utero transfer
MeSH terms
Adult, Echocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Disease Management, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review