The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women Don't Ask? Women Don't Say No? Bargaining and Service in the Political Science Profession
Open accessAbstract
This article examines the dual problems of “women don't ask” and “women don't say no” in the academic profession. First, we consider whether female faculty bargain more or less frequently than male faculty about such resources as salary, research support, clerical support, moving expenses, and spousal accommodation. Analyzing a 2009 APSA survey, we find that women are more likely to ask for resources than men when considering most categories of bargaining issues. This finding goes against conventional wisdom in the literature on gender and bargaining that suggests that women are less likely to bargain than men. Second, we seek to understand if women are reluctant to say no when asked to provide service at the department, college, university, or disciplinary levels. We find that women are asked to provide more service and that they agree to serve more frequently than men. We also find that the service women provide is more typically “token” service, as women are less likely to be asked by their colleagues to serve as department chair, to chair committees, or to lead academic programs. The implications of these results for the leaky pipeline in the academic profession are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rudman, L. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629 · Cited by 1,511
Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001 · Cited by 857
Gender Inequality and Time Allocations Among Academic Faculty
Winslow, S. (2010) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243210386728 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women Taking Care of the Academic Family?
Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. H. (2017) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2 · Cited by 791
Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields
Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2018.12 · Cited by 521
Self-citationGender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability
Babcock, L., Recalde, M. P., Vesterlund, L., & Weingart, L. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20141734 · Cited by 507
Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem
Bayer, A., & Rouse, C. E. (2016) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.4.221 · Cited by 384
Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals
Mitchell, S. M., Lange, S., & Brus, H. (2013) · International Studies Perspectives · doi:10.1111/insp.12026 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, S. M., & Hesli, V. L.
- Venue
- Political Science and Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-03-28
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 355-369
- ISSN
- 0030-8269 (ISSN-L)
- 1049-0965
- 1537-5935
- OpenAlex
- W2153329836
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women Don't Ask? Women Don't Say No? Bargaining and Service in the Political Science Profession. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1049096513000073
- The paper
- Mitchell, S. M., & Hesli, V. L. (2013). Women Don't Ask? Women Don't Say No? Bargaining and Service in the Political Science Profession. Political Science and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096513000073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.