Cited by 857Conflict Management and NegotiationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesGender Diversity and Inequality

Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: sometimes it does hurt to ask

Open access
Bowles, Hannah Riley, Babcock, Linda, Lai, Lei·2007·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women face greater social costs when negotiating than men do; thus, women's greater reluctance to negotiate may represent an adaptive response to social disincentives.

    “That is, women face greater social costs when negotiating than men do; thus, women's greater reluctance to negotiate may represent an adaptive response to social disincentives (Bowles, Babcock, & Lai, 2007).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Bowles, Babcock, & Lai, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Bowles, Hannah Riley
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
84-103
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111460086
Cited by
857
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
FWCI
56.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
gender differences, negotiation initiation, social incentives, gender discrimination, compensation negotiation, anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review