Cited by 6Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Assessing Effects of Treatment With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Pediatric ADHD Using a Parental Survey

Antonucci, Donna, Kunins, Craig, Manos, Michael, López, Frank A., Kerney, Donna L.·2010·CNS Spectrums

Abstract

Introduction: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a prodrug stimulant approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults and children 6–12 years of age. Parent surveys provide valuable information regarding the impact of ADHD treatments. Methods: Parents of children with ADHD beginning treatment with LDX voluntarily completed surveys through an automated telephone system or the Internet before and 6 weeks after LDX treatment initiation. Prescribing physicians received individual reports of the responses for each survey completed by their patients' parents. All patients whose parents completed both baseline and 6 week surveys were included in the analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted for those previously treated with medications to treat ADHD, including mixed amphetamine salts-extended release. Results: LDX treatment was associated with a significant decrease in ADHD symptom interference with school activities, family interactions, homework, and social interactions (P<.01; N= 11,576). Parents rated satisfaction with LDX as significantly higher than with their child's previous treatment (P<.01). On average, global improvement, tolerability, convenience, and satisfaction with LDX were all highly rated. Conclusion: Patients treated with LDX showed significant symptom improvement and parents reported significantly greater satisfaction than with prior treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1092852900000080

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The efficacy and side-effects of LDX are similar to the other long-acting stimulant preparations.

    “The efficacy and side-effects of LDX are similar to the other long-acting stimulant preparations [68-72].”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [69]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonucci, D., Kunins, C., Manos, M., López, F. A., & Kerney, D. L.
Venue
CNS Spectrums
Published
2010-04
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
248-256
ISSN
  • 1092-8529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-6509
OpenAlex
W2415753950
Cited by
6
References
12
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Spectrums (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children with ADHD, stimulant medication, parent-reported outcomes, symptom interference, treatment satisfaction, tolerability
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dextroamphetamine, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Parents, Pediatrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review