Cited by 356Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate and Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended-Release in Children with ADHD: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Analog Classroom Study

Biederman, Joseph, Boellner, Samuel W., Childress, Ann, Lopez, Frank A., Krishnan, Suma, Zhang, Yuxin·2007·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate is a therapeutically inactive prodrug in which d-amphetamine is covalently bound to l-lysine, a naturally occurring amino acid. Pharmacologically active d-amphetamine is released from lisdexamfetamine following oral ingestion.Methods This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover study compared the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine (LDX: 30, 50, or 70 mg) with placebo, with mixed amphetamine salts extended-release (MAS XR: 10, 20, or 30 mg) included as a reference arm of the study, in 52 children aged 6 to 12 years with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an analog classroom setting. The primary efficacy measure was the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Rating Scale; secondary efficacy measures included the Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Derived Measures, and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale.Results LDX treatment significantly improved scores on SKAMP-deportment, SKAMP-attention, PERMP-attempted, PERMP-correct, and CGI-improvement from baseline. Adverse events were similar for both active treatments.Conclusions In a laboratory classroom environment, LDX significantly improved ADHD symptoms versus placebo in school-age children with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.04.015

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biederman, J., Boellner, S. W., Childress, A., Lopez, F. A., Krishnan, S., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Biederman, Joseph
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
970-976
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992488678
Cited by
356
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, prodrugs, academic performance, adverse events
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review