Cited by 58Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Aripiprazole as Augmentation Treatment of Refractory Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder

Hoge, Elizabeth A., Worthington, John J., Kaufman, Rebecca E., Delong, Hannah R., Pollack, Mark H., Simon, Naomi M.·2008·CNS Spectrums

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with anxiety disorders often remain symptomatic despite treatment with a first-line pharmacologic agent. More research examining pharmacotherapy augmentation strategies to improve outcomes is needed. Methods: In an 8-week, open-label, prospective augmentation study, we examined the efficacy and tolerability of the novel antipsychotic agent aripiprazole for adult outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder (n=13) or panic disorder (n=10) who remained symptomatic despite treatment for at least 8 weeks with an adequate (or maximally tolerated) dose of typical pharmacotherapy. Results: Aripiprazole augmentation was associated with a significant reduction in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scores (paired t=4.41, df=22, P<.001) in the intent-to-treat sample of 23 individuals. Three subjects (13%) discontinued due to sedation, chest discomfort, and restlessness, respectively. Conclusion: These data provide preliminary evidence that aripiprazole may be a useful augmentation strategy for individuals with generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder who show a limited response to initial pharmacotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s109285290001676x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no unequivocal definition of treatment-resistant panic disorder, and very heterogeneous criteria have been used across studies, making interpretation of results uncertain.

    “Currently, there is no unequivocal definition of TRPD. Very heterogeneous criteria have been used across different studies, making interpretation of the results uncertain.”

    From Management of Treatment-Resistant Panic Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as [15]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoge, E. A., Worthington, J. J., Kaufman, R. E., Delong, H. R., Pollack, M. H., & Simon, N. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
CNS Spectrums
Published
2008-06
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
522-525
ISSN
  • 1092-8529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-6509
OpenAlex
W38443713
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Spectrums (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
aripiprazole, drug augmentation, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, antipsychotic drugs, treatment-resistant anxiety, tolerability, sedation
MeSH terms
Aripiprazole, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Benzodiazepines, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Piperazines, Prospective Studies, Antipsychotic Agents, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Quinolones, Comorbidity, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review