Cited by 119Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Mechanisms Of Change In Cognitive Therapy: The Case Of Automatic Thought Records And Behavioural Experiments

Bennett-Levy, James·2003·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

The study tested the hypothesis, derived from Teasdale and Barnard's (1993) Interacting Cognitive Subsystems (ICS) model, that two commonly used techniques in cognitive therapy, automatic thought records (ATRs) and behavioural experiments (BEs), would have their primary impact on different cognitive subsystems. Teasdale (1997a, b) has suggested that while ATRs tend to impact on a logic-based propositional information processing system, BEs impact on a more holistic implicational system, which has extensive links with emotion. Quantitative and qualitative data derived from three groups of participants undertaking cognitive therapy training courses, who practised ATRs and BEs on themselves, supported Teasdale's theory. Differences were found in participants' ratings of behaviour and belief change, with BEs being perceived as more powerful and compelling than ATRs, as predicted by the theory. There were also qualitative differences in participants' experiences of the two techniques, suggestive of different modes of processing. The data indicated the particular importance of the therapist's role in BEs. In order to provide a more comprehensive account of ATRs and BEs, it was suggested that Teasdale's theory could profitably be extended to include the role of the therapist in promoting adaptive oscillation between the implicational and propositional modes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465803003035

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive restructuring can facilitate the performance of new and more adaptive behaviors, particularly when accompanied by behavioral experiments.

    “Cognitive restructuring can also facilitate the performance of new and more adaptive behaviors, particularly when accompanied by behavioral experiments (Bennett-Levy, 2003);”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett-Levy, J.
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2003-07
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
261-277
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W1978950909
Cited by
119
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive therapy, behavioural experiments, emotions, belief revision, behavior change, therapist role, mechanisms of change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review