Cited by 2Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and SynchronizationFree Will and Agency

Active disambiguation guides inferring controllability and cause in social interactions

Open access
Spiering, Lisa, Trier, Hailey A., O’Reilly, Jill X., Kolling, Nils, Wittmann, Marco K., Rushworth, Matthew F. S., Scholl, Jacqueline·2025·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

There has been considerable interest in how we ascertain whether an environment is controllable and the neural mechanisms mediating this process. An especially acute version of this problem occurs when multiple people work together. Using a new task, fMRI and computational modelling, we demonstrate that in such ambiguous social contexts, people engage in specific behaviours that we refer to as active disambiguation. This process helps individuals establish what they themselves, as opposed to others, control and what consequence they themselves cause or that another person causes. People identify when active disambiguation is needed and engage in it at that time. A pattern of activity in the supramarginal gyrus that emerges during and after active disambiguation is linked to tracking uncertainty and establishing controllability. We show that activity in this brain region signals a second learning mechanism, by which individuals attribute outcomes to themselves versus others, proportional to their perceived control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-67853-8

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Pearl, J. Causality (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
  2. [92]Spiering, L. Active disambiguation guides inferring controllability and cause in social interactions. Zenodov1.0.0 (2025). PMC12748874 41430061

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiering, L., Trier, H. A., O’Reilly, J. X., Kolling, N., Wittmann, M. K., Rushworth, M. F. S., & Scholl, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Spiering, Lisa
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-12-22
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
11568-11568
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7116675305
Cited by
2
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (203139/Z/16/Z, 221794/Z/20/Z, 203139, 203139/A/16/Z)
  • Government of the United Kingdom
  • UK Research and Innovation
  • European Commission (203139/Z/16/Z)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N014448/1, 203139/Z/16/Z, MR/N013468/1, MR/L019639/1, MR/Y010477/1, MR/N013468/, MR/T031344/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/V004999/1, BB/W003392/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
perceived controllability, causal attribution, social interaction, supramarginal gyrus, self-other attribution, joint action
MeSH terms
Social Interaction, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review