Cited by 67Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The Six Cycles Maintenance Model: Growing a “Vicious Flower” for Depression

Moorey, Stirling·2010·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background:Cognitive behavioural models of anxiety disorders often include visual representations of feedback loops that maintain the disorder. Cognitive therapy for depression is the prototype for therapy for many other disorders, and there is now good evidence for factors that maintain depression, yet there is still no accepted diagrammatic form of the maintenance model.Aims:To develop a simple, clinically acceptable and empirically based version of the “vicious flower” for depression.Method:Current theoretical developments in depression (Differential activation and Beck's concept of modes) and empirical findings on maintenance factors were reviewed. A model was developed based on clinical utility and current knowledge of the processes and maintenance factors in depression. This model was tested for its usefulness with a small sample of IAPT trainees.Results:The model contained 6 cycles comprising 2 cognitive cycles (automatic negative thinking and rumination/self-attacking), 2 behavioural cycles (withdrawal/avoidance and unhelpful behaviour), a mood/emotion cycle, and a motivation/physical symptoms cycle. Students found it a very useful tool for understanding maintenance factors.Conclusions:This diagrammatic maintenance model of depression, like similar “vicious flowers” for anxiety, may be helpful in conceptualization, socialization and treatment planning as well as teaching CBT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465809990580

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moorey, S.
Affiliations
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Moorey, Stirling
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2009-11-20
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
173-184
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W2072940288
Cited by
67
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
depression, maintenance models, cognitive behavioral therapy, hygiene factors, rumination, motivation, somatic symptoms, diagrammatic models
MeSH terms
Affect, Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Environment, Humans, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Self Concept, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review