Cited by 15Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Supportive Mental Health Self-Monitoring among Smartphone Users with Psychological Distress: Protocol for a Fully Mobile Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Beiwinkel, Till, Hey, Stefan, Bock, Olaf, Rössler, Wulf·2017·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) could be widely used in the population to improve access to psychological treatment. In this paper, we describe the development of a mHealth intervention on the basis of supportive self-monitoring and describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate its effectiveness among smartphone users with psychological distress. Based on power analysis, a representative quota sample of N=186 smartphone users will be recruited, with an over-sampling of persons with moderate to high distress. Over a 4-week period, the intervention will be compared to a self-monitoring without intervention group and a passive control group. Telephone interviews will be conducted at baseline, post-intervention (4 weeks), and 12-week follow-up to assess study outcomes. The primary outcome will be improvement of mental health. Secondary outcomes will include well-being, intentions towards help-seeking and help-seeking behavior, user activation, attitudes towards mental health services, perceived stigmatization, smartphone app quality, user satisfaction, engagement, and adherence with the intervention. Additionally, data from the user’s daily life as collected during self-monitoring will be used to investigate risk and protective factors of mental health in real-world settings. Therefore, this study will allow us to demonstrate the effectiveness of a smartphone application as a widely accessible and low-cost intervention to improve mental health on a population level. It also allows to identify new assessment approaches in the field of psychiatric epidemiology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00249

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [64]Bandelow B Lichte T Rudolf S Wiltink J Beutel M S3-Leitlinie angststörungen. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (2014).
  2. [65]Fischer J Nicht erholsamer Schlaf: Leitlinie “S2” der DGSM. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag (2005).
  3. [66]Bühringer G Klein M Reimer J Reymann G Thomasius R Petersen KU S3-Leitlinie Screening, Diagnose und Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen. Heidelberg: Springer (2015).
  4. [90]Fischer EH Farina A Attitudes toward seeking professional psychologial help: a shortened form and considerations for research. J Coll Stud Dev (1995) 36(4): 368– 73.
  5. [97]Meltzer D Development of a common instrument for mental health. In: Nosikov A Gudex C, editors. EUROHIS: Developing Common Instruments for Health Surveys. Amsterdam: IOS Press (2003). 35 p.
  6. [105]Snjiders T Bosker R Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: SAGE (1999).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beiwinkel, T., Hey, S., Bock, O., & Rössler, W.
Affiliations
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Beiwinkel, Till
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2017-09-21
Volume
5
Pages
249-249
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2760061116
Cited by
15
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
mobile health, mobile application, psychological distress, mental health interventions, help-seeking, help-seeking intentions, mental health stigma, user engagement, intervention adherence, well-being, risk and protective factors, psychiatric epidemiology, digital mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review