Cited by 130Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The heterogeneity of mild cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological analysis

LIBON, DAVID J., XIE, SHARON X., EPPIG, JOEL, WICAS, GRAHAM, LAMAR, MELISSA, LIPPA, CAROL, BETTCHER, BRIANNE M., PRICE, CATHERINE C. +3 more·2010·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

A group of 94 nondemented patients self-referred to an outpatient memory clinic for memory difficulties were studied to determine the incidence of single versus multi-domain mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using Petersen criteria. Fifty-five community dwelling normal controls (NC) participants without memory complaints also were recruited. Tests assessing executive control, naming/lexical retrieval, and declarative memory were administered. Thirty-four patients exhibited single-domain MCI, 43 patients presented with multi-domain MCI. When the entire MCI sample (n = 77) was subjected to a cluster analysis, 14 patients were classified with amnesic MCI, 21 patients with dysexecutive MCI, and 42 patients were classified into a mixed/multi-domain MCI group involving low scores on tests of letter fluency, “animal” fluency, and delayed recognition discriminability. Analyses comparing the three cluster-derived MCI groups versus a NC group confirmed the presence of memory and dysexecutive impairment for the amnesic and dysexecutive MCI groups. The mixed MCI group produced lower scores on tests of letter fluency compared with the amnesic MCI and NC groups and lower scores on tests of naming and memory compared with the NC group. In summary, multi-domain MCI is quite common. These data suggest that MCI is a highly nuanced and complex clinical entity. (JINS, 2010, 16, 84–93.)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617709990993

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LIBON, D. J., XIE, S. X., EPPIG, J., WICAS, G., LAMAR, M., LIPPA, C., BETTCHER, B. M., PRICE, C. C., GIOVANNETTI, T., SWENSON, R., & WAMBACH, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
LIBON, DAVID J.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2009-11-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
84-93
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2100091310
Cited by
130
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS060660)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, amnestic MCI, executive function, phonemic fluency, naming, word retrieval, declarative memory, clustering, Petersen criteria, memory clinic patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amnesia, Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Geriatric Assessment, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review