Cited by 81Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Nonliteral language in Alzheimer dementia: A review

Rapp, Alexander M., Wild, Barbara·2011·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

The use of nonliteral language in clinical assessment, especially testing the patients' ability to interpret proverbs, has a long tradition in psychiatry. However, its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in dementias is not yet clear. The aim of this review article is to examine the current evidence on nonliteral/figurative language (proverb, metaphor, metonymy, idiom, irony, sarcasm) comprehension in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. A comprehensive literature search identified 25 studies (16 proverb, 3 metaphor, 0 metonymy, 5 idiom, 3 sarcasm) on nonliteral language comprehension in dementia. Studies predominantly indicate a deficit. Most studies investigated Alzheimer's dementia. Applied correctly, nonliteral language is a worthwhile diagnostic tool to evaluate language and abstract thinking in dementias. During assessment, familiarity testing (e.g., by asking "are you familiar with the proverb XY") is obligatory. Still, future research is needed in several areas: evidence on decline of nonliteral language over the course of the illness is limited. So far, almost no studies delineated proverb comprehension in high risk populations such as patients with mild cognitive impairment. Currently, there is a lack of studies addressing performance in direct comparison to relevant differential diagnosis like older-age depression, delirium, brain lesion, or other psychiatric conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617710001682

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distinct linguistic deficits have been observed in Alzheimer's disease, including lexico-semantic impairment, simplified syntax and altered figurative language processing.

    “Distinct deficits have been observed in Alzheimer's disease (lexico-semantic impairment, 2,29 simplified syntax, 13 altered figurative language processing 16 )”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapp, A. M., & Wild, B.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Rapp, Alexander M.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2011-01-18
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
207-218
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2049153052
Cited by
81
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
figurative language, figurative language comprehension, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, proverbs, metaphor, idioms, sarcasm, irony, metonymy, sensitivity and specificity, mild cognitive impairment, abstract thinking, differential diagnosis
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Language, Neuropsychological Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Databases, Bibliographic, Metaphor, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review