Cited by 70Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Cognitive Rehabilitation Multi-family Group Intervention for Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Care-Partners

Schmitter-Edgecombe, Maureen, Dyck, Dennis G.·2014·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

There is increasing need for early, pro-active programs that can delay dementia diagnosis and enhance well-being of individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their care-partners (i.e., care-dyads). This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a combined cognitive rehabilitation and multi-family group treatment (CR-MFG) that was designed to facilitate adoption of newly learned cognitive strategies into the care-dyads everyday lives. Analyzed data included 23 care-dyads who participated in CR-MFG treatment and 23 care-dyads in standard care (SC). The 3-month intervention consisted of individual joining sessions, an educational workshop, and 20/twice weekly multifamily memory strategy training and problem-solving sessions. Everyday functioning, memory, and psychological functioning (i.e., quality-of-life, depression, coping) were assessed. The CR-MFG intervention was associated with significant post-test group differences and improved post-test performances by the MCI participants on performance-based measures of everyday functioning and neuropsychological tests of memory. There was also some suggestion that CR-MFG care-partners perceived positive change in the everyday functioning of the MCI participants. In contrast, no post-test group differences were found for either care-dyad member on the self-report psychological measures; care-partners in the treatment group did self-report improved coping behaviors at post-test. These 3-month results are preliminary but suggestive that CR-MFG may produce modest, practical everyday functional benefits for persons with MCI. ( JINS , 2014, 20 , 1–12)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617714000782

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With regard to mood, well-being and quality of life, no therapeutic effects in MCI patients, neither at short-term (3 months) nor at long-term (24 months) follow-up, were detected in most studies, including four randomized controlled trials and one randomized non-controlled trial.

    “With regard to mood, well-being and quality of life no therapeutic effects in MCI patients, neither at short-term (3 months) nor at long-term (24 months) follow-up, were detected in most studies, including four randomized controlled trials [48–51, 54, 59, 60] and one randomized non-controlled trial [52, 53].”
  • A total of 10 research groups described psychoeducational interventions in individuals with MCI in addition to cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, mindfulness-based stress reduction, behavioral activation, or enriched by a recovery model approach.

    “A total of 10 research groups described psychoeducational interventions in addition to cognitive rehabilitation [38, 50], cognitive training [52, 53, 59, 60, 65], mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) [46, 47, 57, 58], behavioral activation [44, 45, 48, 49, 51, 54], or enriched by a recovery model approach [67]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Dyck, D. G.
Affiliations
Washington State University Spokane (US)
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
897-908
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W1971312117
Cited by
70
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, cognitive rehabilitation, care partners, dementia prevention, daily functioning, quality of life, depression, coping, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review