The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering and switching strategies in verbal fluency tasks: Comparison between schizophrenics and healthy adults
Abstract
Verbal fluency tasks are frequently used in clinical neuropsychology. Clustering (the production of words within semantic subcategories) and switching (the ability to shift between clusters) have been described as 2 components underlying fluency performance. We compared the use of clustering and switching in schizophrenic patients and healthy subjects. Seventy-eight schizophrenic subjects (DSM–IV criteria) and 64 control participants matched for age and educational level were recruited. Negative, disorganized, and productive clinical dimensions were evaluated using the SANS and SAPS scales. The number of words generated per semantic–phonemic cluster and the number of switches were evaluated during 2 verbal fluency tasks (phonemic and semantic). In the healthy controls switching and clustering were closely related to the total number of words generated in the verbal fluency tests. The role of the 2 components was partly dependent on the specific task. Switching was prevalent in formal fluency, while both switching and clustering contributed to semantic fluency. In comparison to the healthy controls, the overall group of schizophrenic patients showed a significant impairment of switching in the formal fluency task and of both switching and clustering in the semantic fluency task, and both the negative and disorganized dimensions correlated with verbal fluency performance, the number of switches during the phonemic fluency task, and the clustering during semantic fluency task. (JINS, 1998, 4, 539–546.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DEFICITS IN STRATEGY APPLICATION FOLLOWING FRONTAL LOBE DAMAGE IN MAN
SHALLICE, T., & BURGESS, P. W. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.2.727 · Cited by 2,017
The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0601 · Cited by 1,901
Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138 · Cited by 1,241
Frith, C. D. (1987) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700025873 · Cited by 655
A Role for the Hippocampus in Card Sorting?
Corcoran, R., & Upton, D. (1993) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80182-7 · Cited by 195
Cited by
Ventura, J., Hellemann, G. S., Thames, A. D., Koellner, V., & Nuechterlein, K. H. (2009) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.035 · Cited by 560
KOSMIDIS, M. H., VLAHOU, C. H., PANAGIOTAKI, P., & KIOSSEOGLOU, G. (2004) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617704102014 · Cited by 398
Letter and category fluency in schizophrenic patients: a meta-analysis
Bokat, C. E., & Goldberg, T. E. (2003) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00282-7 · Cited by 234
Is semantic memory impaired in schizophrenia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 91 studies.
Doughty, O. J., & Done, D. J. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800903073291 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- ROBERT, P. H., LAFONT, V., MEDECIN, I., BERTHET, L., THAUBY, S., BAUDU, C., & DARCOURT, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 539-546
- ISSN
- 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7661
- OpenAlex
- W2029915662
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering and switching strategies in verbal fluency tasks: Comparison between schizophrenics and healthy adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355617798466025
- The paper
- ROBERT, P. H., LAFONT, V., MEDECIN, I., BERTHET, L., THAUBY, S., BAUDU, C., & DARCOURT, G. (1998). Clustering and switching strategies in verbal fluency tasks: Comparison between schizophrenics and healthy adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617798466025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.