Cited by 1,241Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults.

Troyer, Angela K., Moscovitch, Morris, Winocur, Gordon·1997·Neuropsychology

Abstract

Although verbal fluency is a frequently used neuropsychological test, little is known about the underlying cognitive processes. The authors proposed that 2 important components of fluency performance are clustering (i.e., the production of words within semantic or phonemic subcategories) and switching (i.e., the ability to shift between clusters). In Experiment 1, correlational data from 54 older and 41 younger adults indicated that both components were highly correlated with the number of words generated on semantic fluency, whereas switching was more highly correlated than clustering with the number of words generated on phonemic fluency. On semantic fluency, younger participants generated more words and switched more frequently than older participants; on phonemic fluency, older participants produced larger clusters than younger participants. In Experiment 2, among 22 young adults, divided attention decreased the number of words generated and decreased switching on phonemic fluency only. Overall, findings suggest that clustering and switching are dissociable fluency components and that switching is related to frontal-lobe functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By increasing people's confidence, such cues can affect their metacognitive control, leading people to decrease the effort they invest into further deliberate processing, as measured by thinking time and changes-of-mind.

    “By increasing people's confidence, such cues can affect their metacognitive control, leading people to decrease the effort they invest into further deliberate processing, as measured by thinking time and changes-of-mind [4,183,184].”

    From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [184]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G.
Affiliations
Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care (CA)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
1997
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
138-146
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W2147230519
Cited by
1,241
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 62
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
verbal fluency, semantic clustering, switching, semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, divided attention, aging, older adults, frontal lobe function, cognitive aging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review