Cited by 197Epilepsy research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

A Role for the Hippocampus in Card Sorting?

Open access
Corcoran, Rhiannon, Upton, Dominic·1993·Cortex

Abstract

This study examines the performance of three groups of patients with epilepsy on three measures typically used to assess the integrity of the frontal lobes: the Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (MWCST), verbal fluency and the Stroop test. The groups comprised sixteen patients with clearly defined hippocampal sclerosis, thirteen patients with unilateral temporal lobe seizure onset and eighteen patients with unilateral frontal lobe onset. Results demonstrated that performance on the MWCST was most compromised by hippocampal sclerosis. These patients took longer to complete the task, achieved fewer categories and made more perseverative errors than patients in the other groups. In contrast, verbal fluency and performance on the Stroop test were less affected by the presence of hippocampal sclerosis. These results have both clinical and theoretical significance. It is argued that patients with hippocampal damage perform poorly on the MWCST because of the heavy working memory requirements of the test. Cautious use of this test as a tool to localise seizure origin in patients with complex partial seizures is therefore recommended. The findings are discussed in terms of Gray's (1982) model of the hippocampus as a comparator of actions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80182-7

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Milner's finding of a specific dorsolateral prefrontal deficit on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test has never been entirely replicated by Milner or any other investigator, although there are many failures to replicate.

    “However this finding has never to our knowledge been entirely replicated, either by Milner or by any other investigator, although there are many failures to replicate (see, e.g., Anderson et al., 1995; Corcoran & Upton, 1993; van den Broek et al., 1993).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corcoran, R., & Upton, D.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
293-304
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004181597
Cited by
195
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
hippocampus, hippocampal sclerosis, epilepsy, perseverative errors, verbal fluency, Stroop task, working memory, frontal lobe function, temporal lobe epilepsy, frontal lobe epilepsy, complex partial seizures
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Neoplasms, Discrimination Learning, Dominance, Cerebral, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Female, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Temporal Lobe, Epilepsy, Frontal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review