The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emotion-memory effects in bilingual speakers: A levels-of-processing approach*
Abstract
Emotion-memory effects occur when emotion words are more frequently recalled than neutral words. Bilingual speakers report that taboo terms and emotional phrases generate a stronger emotional response when heard or spoken in their first language. This suggests that the basic emotion-memory will be stronger for words presented in a first language. Turkish–English bilinguals performed a deep processing task (emotional-intensity rating) or shallow processing task (counting letter features) and two additional deep processing tasks (translation and word association) on five categories of words (taboo words, reprimands, positive words, negative words, and neutral words), followed by a surprise recall task. Reprimands had the highest recall in English (L2), which may be a novelty effect. If reprimands are set aside, then overall emotion-memory effects were similar in the two languages, with taboo words having the highest recall, followed by positive words. Negative words had no recall advantage over neutral words, an unexpected finding. Results indicate that emotional attributes of words are equally available to boost memory in a first and second language in both shallow and deep processing tasks, athough some task-specific effects did occur.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ayçiçegi-Dinn and Caldwell-Harris (2009) reported that experimental designs affect whether or not emotion-memory effects are observed in bilinguals.”
From What Heritage Bilinguals Tell Us about the Language of Emotion (2022) · cites this paper as Ayçiçegi-Dinn and Caldwell-Harris 2009
In the citing paper
“This aligns with other studies, where emotion effects have been found in the societal language (Ayçiçegi and Harris 2004;Ayçiçegi-Dinn and Caldwell-Harris 2009;Fan et al. 2018).”
From What Heritage Bilinguals Tell Us about the Language of Emotion (2022) · cites this paper as Ayçiçegi-Dinn and Caldwell-Harris 2009
Citations
Cites
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System
Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2012) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15082-000 · Cited by 2,683
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 · Cited by 2,656 · cited 4×
“Bilingual researchers generally assume that translating from L2 to L1 is the easier translation direction, because during initial learning, L2 words may be learned as direct translations of L1 words (Kroll and Stewart, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.21832/9781853598746-013 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X · DOI · Paper page
- Rappaport, 1942, Emotions and memory
- 10.1080/00207450290025752 · DOI
- 10.1080/01434630408666530 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.036 · DOI
- 10.1558/sols.v5i1.83 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.09.006 · DOI
- Harris [Caldwell-Harris], 2006, Languages and emotions of bilingual people, 257
- 10.21832/9781853598746-007 · DOI
- Iyer, 2001, Center for Research in Language Newsletter
- 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70875-X · DOI
- McDaniel, 1995, The bizarreness effect: It's not surprising, it's complex, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 422
- 10.1080/02699939408408956 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90133-3 · DOI
- 10.21832/9781853598746 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03209231 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0142716403000286 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61486-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0093-934X(86)90016-7 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03204507 · DOI
- Toglia, 1978, Handbook of semantic word norms
- Reber, 1994, Levels of processing and memory for emotional words, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 53, 78
- 10.1080/02699930601054133 · DOI · Paper page
- Tzelgov, 1990, Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 760
- 10.1177/0739986399211003 · DOI
- de Groot, 1992, Determinants of word translation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1001
- 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00776.x · DOI
- 10.1080/02699930601054109 · DOI
- Berny, 1968, Semantic independence and degree of bilingualism in two Puerto Rican communities, Revista Interamericana de Psicologia, 2, 289
- Ayçiçegi[-Dinn], 2004, Bilinguals’ recall and recognition of emotion words, Cognition and Emotion, 18, 977, 10.1080/02699930341000301 · DOI
- Schrauf, 2004, The ‘language’ and ‘feel’ of bilingual memory: Mnemonic traces, Estudios de Sociolinguistica, 5, 41
- 10.1177/1354067X0064001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.003 · DOI
- Pavlenko, 2005, Emotions and multilingualism
- Gonzalez-Reigosa, 1976, Cross-cultural anxiety, 89
- Izura, 2002, Age of acquistion effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages, Psicologia, 23, 245
- 10.2307/20445445 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7028.25.4.388 · DOI
- 10.1080/01434630408666529 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7 · Cited by 205
What Heritage Bilinguals Tell Us about the Language of Emotion
Vargas Fuentes, N. A., Kroll, J. F., & Torres, J. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7020144 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- AYÇIÇEGI-DINN, A., & CALDWELL-HARRIS, C. L.
- Venue
- Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-303
- ISSN
- 1366-7289
- 1469-1841
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review