CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathways for learning two languages: lexical and grammatical associations within and across languages in sequential bilingual children

PHAM, GIANG·2016·Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
DOI 10.1017/s1366728915000899PMC PMC5901900
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examines the strength and direction of lexical-grammatical associations within and between first and second languages (L1 and L2) in a longitudinal sample of sequential bilinguals. Thirty-three children who spoke Vietnamese (L1) and English (L2) completed picture-naming and story-telling tasks in each language at four yearly intervals. Hierarchical linear modeling across Years 1–4 revealed bidirectional within-language associations and a unidirectional cross-language association from the L1 to L2. Results suggest a conditional relationship between languages in which the L1 supports L2 growth, but not vice versa. Findings contribute to defining pathways for L1 and L2 learning across domains and languages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1366728915000899

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.3102/00346543049002222 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Brown, 1997, Test of Nonverbal Intelligence
  3. Mayer, 1967, A boy, a dog, and a frog
  4. 10.1017/S0142716401002028 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/01.TLD.0000318937.39301.76 · DOI
  6. 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0126) · DOI
  7. Baayen, 1995, The CELEX Lexical Database
  8. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S1366728906002732 · DOI
  10. 10.1207/s15434311laq0302_2 · DOI
  11. Pham G. (2011). Dual language development among Vietnamese–English bilingual children: modeling trajectories and cross-linguistic associations within a Dynamic Systems framework. Unpublished dissertation. University of Minnesota.
  12. Miller, 2012, Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) Research Version
  13. 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/066) · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00340.x · DOI
  15. Pearson, 2002, Language and literacy in bilingual children, 135, 10.21832/9781853595721-008 · DOI
  16. Woodcock, 1996, Batería Woodcock-muñoz: Pruebas de aprovechamiento revisada
  17. 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0388) · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Woodcock, 1991, Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery – Revised
  20. Mayer, 1975, One frog too many
  21. 10.3758/BRM.40.1.154 · DOI
  22. Widaman, 2006, Missing data: What to do with or without them, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71, 42
  23. 10.1037/a0015817 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1177/0895904805278067 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1017/S0142716409090134 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Bates, 1997, On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing, Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507, 10.1080/016909697386628 · DOI
  27. 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0173) · DOI
  28. Pham, 2015, Applied Psycholinguistics
  29. Kohnert, 2013, Language disorders in bilingual children and adults
  30. 10.1075/loall.9 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/13682820410001729655 · DOI
  32. To, 2010, Narrative assessment for Cantonese-speaking children, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 648, 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0039) · DOI
  33. Berman, 1994, Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study
  34. 10.1044/0161-1461(2007/024) · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01112.x · DOI · Paper page
  36. Cao, 1988, The count/mass distinction in Vietnamese and the concept of ‘classifier’, Zeitschrift fur Phonetik Sprachwissenschaft un Kommunikationsforschung, 41, 38
  37. 10.1111/1467-7687.00298 · DOI
  38. Long, 2012, Longitudinal data analysis for the behavioral sciences using R
  39. Strong, 1998, The strong narrative assessment procedure (SNAP)
  40. 10.1111/cdev.12137 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
PHAM, G.
Venue
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2016-01-14
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
928-938
ISSN
  • 1366-7289
  • 1469-1841
DOI
10.1017/s1366728915000899
PMC
PMC5901900
Cited by
37
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review