Cited by 197Language Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHearing Impairment and Communication

Language sample measures and language ability in Spanish-English bilingual kindergarteners

Open access
Bedore, Lisa M., Peña, Elizabeth D., Gillam, Ronald B., Ho, Tsung-Han·2010·Journal of Communication Disorders

Abstract

Unlabelled Measures of productivity and sentence organization are useful metrics for quantifying language development and language impairments in monolingual and bilingual children. It is not yet known what measures within and across languages are most informative when evaluating the language skills of bilingual children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how measures of language productivity and organization in two languages converge with children's measured language abilities on the Bilingual English Spanish Assessment (BESA), a standardized measure of language ability. 170 kindergarten age children who produced narrative language samples in Spanish and in English based on a wordless picture book were included in the analysis. Samples were analyzed for number of utterances, number of different words, mean length of utterance, and percentage of grammatical utterances. The best predictors of language ability as measured by the BESA scores were English MLU, English grammaticality, and Spanish grammaticality. Results are discussed in relationship to the nature of the measures in each of the languages and in regard to their potential utility for identifying low language ability in bilingual. Learning outcomes The reader will be able to identify (1) why narratives are useful for evaluating bilingual language ability, (2) which measures of productivity and sentence organization in narratives best capture language ability and development in bilingual children, (3) how a bilingual or composite language ability across two languages can be determined, and (4) what relationship exists between measures of productivity and sentence organization in each language with a bilingual language ability score.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.05.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on cross-language cross-domain correlations has not investigated modulating effects of language distance.

    “Evidence for significant cross-language cross-domain (lexicon, grammar) correlations is limited (Bedore et al., 2010;Simon-Cereijido & Gutiérrez-Clellen, 2009), but this research has not investigated any modulating effects of language distance.”

    From Cross-language distance influences receptive vocabulary outcomes of bilingual children (2020) · cites this paper as Bedore et al., 2010

    The Discussion describes measures from Spanish and English across domains, and the study examines only that language pair; it does not investigate whether language distance modulates correlations. Results §3.1 reports correlations among measures, but the passages do not establish the cited sentence’s more specific claim of significant cross-language, cross-domain lexicon–grammar correlations. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence for significant cross-language cross-domain (lexicon, grammar) correlations is limited.

    “Evidence for significant cross-language cross-domain (lexicon, grammar) correlations is limited (Bedore et al., 2010;Simon-Cereijido & Gutiérrez-Clellen, 2009), but this research has not investigated any modulating effects of language distance.”

    From Cross-language distance influences receptive vocabulary outcomes of bilingual children (2020) · cites this paper as Bedore et al., 2010

    The Introduction (§1.2; page unavailable) says earlier work generally examined measures in one language or the other rather than combining information across languages, supporting the broad point that cross-language evidence was limited. Results (§3.1; page unavailable) discusses correlations but does not establish specifically that significant cross-language, cross-domain lexicon–grammar correlations are limited. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Bedore LM 2001 Assessing Morphosyntax in Spanish-speaking children Seminars in Speech and Language 22 1 65 77 11302457
  2. Bedore LM Leonard LB 1998 Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 41 5 1185 1192 9771639
  3. Bedore LM Leonard LB 2001 Grammatical morphology deficits in Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment Journal of Speech,Language, and Hearing Research 44 905 924 11521782
  4. Bedore LM Peña ED 2008 Assessment of bilingual children for identification of language impairment: Current findings and implications for practice International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 11 1 1 29
  5. Bedore LM Peña ED García M Cortez C 2005 Conceptual versus monolingual scoring: When does it make a difference? Speech, Language, Hearing Services in Schools 36 188 200 16175883
  6. Bland-Stewart LM Fitzgerald SM 2001 Use of Browns 14 grammatical morphemes by bilingual Hispanic preschoolers: a pilot study Communication Disorders Quarterly 22 4 171 186
  7. Brown R 1973 A First Language: The Early Stages Cambridge Harvard University Press
  8. Brownell R 2001 Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test Spanish-Bilingual Edition Novato, CA Academic Therapy Publications
  9. Castilla A Restrepo MA Perez-Leroux AT 2009 Individual differences and language interdependence: A study of sequential bilingual development in Spanish-English preschool children International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 99999 1
  10. Damico JS Oller JW Jr 1983 The diagnosis of language disorders in bilingual children: Surface-oriented and pragmatic criteria Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 48 385 394 6645433
  11. Fiestas CE Peña ED 2004 Narrative discourse in bilingual children: Language and task effects Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools 35 2 155 168 15191327
  12. Gillam RB Johnston JR 1992 Spoken and written language relationships in language/learning-impaired and normally achieving school-age children Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 35 6 1303 1315 1283612
  13. Gutiérrez-Clellen VF Restrepo MA Bedore LM Peña ED Anderson RT 2000 Language sample analysis in Spanish-speaking children: Methodological considerations Language, Speech & Hearing Services in the Schools 31 1 88 98 27764338
  14. Gutiérrez-Clellen VF Restrepo MA Simón-Cereijido G 2006 Evaluating the discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure with Spanish-speaking children Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49 6 1209 1223 PMC3373311 17197491
  15. Gutiérrez-Clellen VF Simón-Cereijido G 2007 The discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure with Latino English-speaking children Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50 4 968 981 PMC3367477 17675599
  16. Gutiérrez-Clellen VF Simón-Cereijido G Wagner C 2008 Bilingual children with language impairment: A comparison with monolinguals and second language learners Applied Psycholinguistics 29 3 19 PMC3368375 22685359
  17. Hadley PA 1998 Language-sampling protocols for eliciting text-level discourse Language, Speech & Hearing Services in the Schools 29 3 132 147 27764420
  18. Hewitt LE Hammer CS Yont KM Tomblin JB 2005 Language sampling for kindergarten children with and without SLI: Mean length of utterance, IPSYN, and NDW Journal of Communication Disorders 38 3 197 15748724
  19. Jacobson PF Schwartz RG 2005 English past tense use in bilingual children with language impairment American Journal of Speech Language Pathology 14 4 313 323 16396614
  20. Jax VA 1988 Narrative construction by children learning English as a second language: A precursor to reading comprehension Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of California Los Angeles
  21. Klee T Stokes SF Wong A Fletcher P Gavin WJ 2004 Utterance length and linguistic diversity in Cantonese-speaking children with and without language impairment Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47 1396 1410 15842018
  22. Kohnert K Danahy K 2007 Young L2 learners’ performance on a novel morpheme task Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 21 7 557 569 17564857
  23. Leonard LB 1998 Children with Specific Language Impairment Cambridge, MA Bradford Books
  24. Leonard LB Eyer JA Bedore LM Grela BG 1997 Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40 4 741 753 9263940
  25. Mayer M 1969 Frog, where are you? New York, NY Penguin Books
  26. Mayer M 1974 Frog goes to dinner New York, NY Penguin books
  27. Muñoz ML Gillam RB Peña ED Gulley-Faehnle A 2003 Measures of language development in fictional narratives of Latino children Language, Speech & Hearing Services in the Schools 34 332 342 27764461
  28. Owen AJ Leonard LB 2002 Lexical diversity in the spontaneous speech of children with specific language impairment: Application of D Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45 5 927 937 12381050
  29. Paradis J Crago M Genesee F Rice ML 2003 French-English bilingual children with SLI: How do they compare with their monolingual peers? Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 46 1 113 12647892
  30. Pearson BZ Fernández S Oller DK 1993 Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers:comparison to monolingual norms Language and Learning 43 1 93 120
  31. Peña ED Bedore LM 2008 Bilingualism and Language Impairment in Children Schwartz R Handbook of Child Language Disorders 281 307 New York Psychology Press
  32. Peña ED Bedore LM Rappazzo C 2003 Comparison of Spanish, English,and bilingual children’s performance across semantic tasks Language, Speech & Hearing Services in the Schools 34 1 5 16 27764487
  33. Peña ED Bedore LM Zlatic-Guinta R 2002 Category-generation performance of bilingual children: The influence of condition, category, and language Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 45 938 947 12381051
  34. Redmond SM 2004 Conversational profiles of children with ADHD, SLI and typical development Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 18 2 107 125 15086133
  35. Restrepo MA 1998 Identifiers of predominantly Spanish-speaking children with language impairment Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research 41 6 1398 1411 9859894
  36. Rice ML Wexler K 1996 Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 39 6 1239 1257 8959609
  37. Rice ML Wexler K Hershberger S 1998 Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41 6 1412 1431 9859895
  38. Simón-Cereijido G Gutiérrez-Clellen VF 2009 A cross-linguistic and bilingual evaluation of the interdependence between lexical and grammatical domains Applied Psycholinguistics 30 2 315 337 19444336 PMC2681320
  39. Uccelli P Páez MM 2007 Narrative and vocabulary development of bilingual children from kindergarten to first grade: Developmental changes and associations among English and Spanish skills Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 38 3 225 236 PMC2881826 17625049
  40. Watkins RV Kelly DJ Harbers HM Hollis W 1995 Measuring children’s lexical diversity: Differentiating typical and atypical language learners Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34 1134 1141
  41. Wiig EH Secord WA Semel E 2006 Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-4 Spanish San Antonio Pearson Asessment
  42. Zimmerman IL Steiner VG Pond RE 2002 Preschool Language Scale-4 Spanish Edition San Antonio The Psychological Corporation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Gillam, R. B., & Ho, T.-H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bedore, Lisa M.
Venue
Journal of Communication Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
498-510
ISSN
0021-9924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048913568
Cited by
197
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC007439)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
Spanish-English bilingual children, language ability assessment, language productivity, sentence structure, mean length of utterance, grammaticality, language development, kindergarten children
MeSH terms
Child Language, Child, Preschool, Humans, Language Development, Language Tests, Longitudinal Studies, Multilingualism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review