Cited by 181Medication Adherence and ComplianceGlobal Maternal and Child HealthPublic Health and Nutrition

Compliance with iron-folic acid (IFA) therapy among pregnant women in an urban area of south India

Open access
Mithra, P, Unnikrishnan, B, Rekha, T, Nithin, K, Mohan, K, Kulkarni, V, Kulkarni, V, Agarwal, D·2014·African Health Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is highly prevalent among pregnant women and iron deficiency is the most important cause. Like many other countries, India has policies to give pregnant women iron supplements. Non-compliance is one important challenging factor in combating anaemia. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the compliance for IFA tablets among pregnant women and to study the social factors influencing it. METHODOLOGY: This study included 190 pregnant women seeking ante-natal care in tertiary health Centres in the Mangalore city in South India. After Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval, data was collected by personal interview. Missing ≥2 doses consecutively was considered non-compliance. The data was analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 11.5. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 25.8 years (SD: 4.1). Majority of the subjects consumed mixed diet and 72.1% belonged to lower socioeconomic status. Overall, compliance with IFA tablets was 64.7%. Compliance increased with the increase in age, birth order and single daily dose. Forgetfulness and both perceived as well as experienced side effects of IFA therapy were the important factors for non-compliance. CONCLUSION: There was a moderate level of Compliance towards IFA tablets with key social and demographic factors playing important role.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4314/ahs.v13i4.3

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mithra, P., Unnikrishnan, B., Rekha, T., Nithin, K., Mohan, K., Kulkarni, V, Kulkarni, V, & Agarwal, D.
Affiliations
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Corresponding author
Mithra, P
Venue
African Health Sciences
Published
2014-01-23
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
880
ISSN
1680-6905 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159161312
Cited by
181
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • African Health Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
  • Bioline International (Bioline International) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
Keywords
iron and folic acid supplementation, medication adherence, pregnant women, anemia in pregnancy, iron deficiency, forgetfulness, adverse effects, once-daily dosing, socioeconomic status, Mangalore
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Folic Acid, Humans, India, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Tablets, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency, Iron, Dietary, Dietary Supplements, Pregnant Women, Pregnant People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review