Cited by 108Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorFood and Agricultural Sciences

What's on the menu? A review of the energy and nutritional content of US chain restaurant menus

Open access
Wu, Helen W, Sturm, Roland·2013·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to (i) describe the availability of nutrition information in major chain restaurants, (ii) document the energy and nutrient levels of menu items, (iii) evaluate relationships with restaurant characteristics, menu labelling and trans fat laws, and nutrition information accessibility, and (iv) compare energy and nutrient levels against industry-sponsored and government-issued nutrition criteria. Design: Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis of the energy, total fat, saturated fat,trans fat, sodium, carbohydrate and protein levels of 28 433 regular and 1833 children's menu items. Setting: Energy and nutrition information provided on restaurant websites or upon request, and secondary databases on restaurant characteristics. Subjects: The top 400 US chain restaurants by sales, based on the 2009 list of the Restaurants & Institutions magazine. Results: Complete nutrition information was reported for 245 (61 %) restaurants. Appetizers had more energy, fat and sodium than all other item types. Children's menu specialty beverages had more fat, saturated fat and carbohydrates than comparable regular menu beverages. The majority of main entrées fell below one-third of the US Department of Agriculture's estimated daily energy needs, but as few as 3 % were also within limits for sodium, fat and saturated fat. Main entrées had significantly more energy, fat and saturated fat in family-style restaurants than in fast-food restaurants. Restaurants that made nutrition information easily accessible on websites had significantly lower energy, fat and sodium contents across menu offerings than those providing information only upon request. Conclusions: The paper provides a comprehensive view of chain restaurant menu nutrition prior to nationwide labelling laws. It offers baseline data to evaluate how restaurants respond after laws are implemented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s136898001200122x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bundling beverages and side dishes with kids' meals may negatively affect nutritional quality of the meal when beverages and side dishes are high in calories and low in nutrients.

    “At full-service and quick-service restaurants, main dishes for children are often bundled with beverages and side dishes (referred to herein as “kids’ meals”), which may negatively affect nutritional quality of the meal when beverages and side dishes are high in calories and low in nutrients [6, 8–10].”

    From Child and parent perspectives on healthier side dishes and beverages in restaurant kids’ meals: results from a national survey in the United States (2018) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion says children’s specialty beverages are often sugary and high in energy, and the Conclusions warn that extras can be problematic when assessing an entire meal. The Energy and nutritional content section also reports that at most 33% of children’s sides met Kids LiveWell criteria. The paper does not establish that children’s entrées are often bundled with beverages and sides at both full-service and quick-service restaurants. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health (2009) California menu labeling guidelines. http://www. emd.saccounty.net/EnvHealth/FoodProtect/MenuLabeling. html (accessed August 2011).
  2. Institute of Medicine Committee on Nutrition Standards for National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs (2010) School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children [VA Stallings, CW Suitor and CL Taylor, editors]. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  3. National Conference of State Legislatures (2011) Bill informa- tion service -trans fat and menu labeling information. http:// www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid514362 (accessed May 2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, H. W., & Sturm, R.
Affiliations
RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Helen W
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2012-05-11
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
87-96
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2033963321
Cited by
108
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
restaurant chains, nutrition labeling, trans fatty acids, sodium, saturated fat, energy content, restaurant websites, fast food restaurants, restaurant menu items
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Commerce, Diet, Food Labeling, Humans, Nutritive Value, Restaurants, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Nutrition Policy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review