Cited by 491Food Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

Food security and sustainability: can one exist without the other?

Open access
Berry, Elliot M, Dernini, Sandro, Burlingame, Barbara, Meybeck, Alexandre, Conforti, Piero·2015·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To position the concept of sustainability within the context of food security. DESIGN: An overview of the interrelationships between food security and sustainability based on a non-systematic literature review and informed discussions based principally on a quasi-historical approach from meetings and reports. SETTING: International and global food security and nutrition. RESULTS: The Rome Declaration on World Food Security in 1996 defined its three basic dimensions as: availability, accessibility and utilization, with a focus on nutritional well-being. It also stressed the importance of sustainable management of natural resources and the elimination of unsustainable patterns of food consumption and production. In 2009, at the World Summit on Food Security, the concept of stability/vulnerability was added as the short-term time indicator of the ability of food systems to withstand shocks, whether natural or man-made, as part of the Five Rome Principles for Sustainable Global Food Security. More recently, intergovernmental processes have emphasized the importance of sustainability to preserve the environment, natural resources and agro-ecosystems (and thus the overlying social system), as well as the importance of food security as part of sustainability and vice versa. CONCLUSIONS: Sustainability should be considered as part of the long-term time dimension in the assessment of food security. From such a perspective the concept of sustainable diets can play a key role as a goal and a way of maintaining nutritional well-being and health, while ensuring the sustainability for future food security. Without integrating sustainability as an explicit (fifth?) dimension of food security, today's policies and programmes could become the very cause of increased food insecurity in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s136898001500021x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Achieving food security and sovereignty will require developing sustainable land management strategies to conserve and enhance ecosystem resiliency and reclaim traditional foods systems.

    “Achieving both will require developing sustainable land management strategies to conserve and enhance ecosystem resiliency and reclaim traditional foods systems (Sunderland, 2011;Berry et al., 2015).”

    From The Potential of Bison Restoration as an Ecological Approach to Future Tribal Food Sovereignty on the Northern Great Plains (2022) · cites this paper as Berry et al., 2015

    The ‘Introducing sustainability as part of food security’ section says sustainable management of natural resources is a condition for food security and calls for maintaining ecological processes that support food production. That supports the land-management and ecosystem-conservation aspects, but our copy does not establish that reclaiming traditional food systems is required or address food sovereignty as a goal. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. United Nations (1975) Report of the World Food Conference, Rome, 5-16 November 1974. New York: UN.
  2. Sen A (1981) Poverty and Famines. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. United Nations Development Programme (1994) Human Development Report. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berry, E. M., Dernini, S., Burlingame, B., Meybeck, A., & Conforti, P.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
Corresponding author
Berry, Elliot M
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2015-02-16
Volume
18
Issue
13
Pages
2293-2302
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2153581691
Cited by
491
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
food security, sustainability, sustainable diets, food availability, food access, food utilization, natural resource management, food consumption patterns, food production, nutritional well-being, food security policy
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Diet, Food Supply, Humans, Systems Theory, Global Health, Program Evaluation, Nutrition Policy, Environmental Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review